High School Calculating the Angle Between Virtual Sources of Fresnel's Biprism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shovon00000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
Click For Summary
The angle in radians is used when calculating the distance between the virtual sources of Fresnel's biprism due to the small angle approximation, where sin(α) closely approximates α in radians. The formula for separation is d = 2(μ – 1) sin(α) y1, which simplifies to d = 2(μ – 1) α y1 for small angles. An example calculation shows that 2 degrees converts to approximately 0.0349 radians, aligning with the small angle approximation. A correction was noted in the calculations, emphasizing the need to use π when converting degrees to radians. Accurate calculations are crucial for precise results in optical experiments involving Fresnel's biprism.
Shovon00000
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why is the angle in radians when we calculate the distance between the virtual sources of Fresnel's biprism??
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220613-010132.png
    Screenshot_20220613-010132.png
    22.6 KB · Views: 181
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to be an approximation for the tan of the very small angle α.
 
Shovon00000 said:
Why is the angle in radians when we calculate the distance between the virtual sources of Fresnel's biprism??
The formula (using your symbols) for the separation between the sources is really:
##d = 2(\mu – 1) sin(\alpha) y_1##.

But since ##\alpha## is small, we can use the small angle approximation. There is very little difference between the values of ##sin(\alpha)## and ##\alpha## in radians.

##2º = 2 \times \frac {\pi}{180}## radians ##= \frac {\pi}{90}## radians ##= 0.0349## radians
##sin(2º) = 0.0349##
(Check it for yourself on a calculator.)

So we simplify the above formula to:
##d = 2(\mu – 1) \alpha y_1##.

By the way, the working in your attachment has a mistake. It says:
##d = \frac {2(1.5 – 1) \times 10} {90} = ...##
but it should say:
##d = \frac {2(1.5 – 1) \times \pi \times 10} {90} = ...##
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K