gracy
- 2,486
- 83
What about my 29th post,is it correct?
The discussion revolves around the concept of virtual sources in Fresnel's biprism experiment, exploring how these virtual sources are formed and their role in the context of interference patterns. Participants engage in clarifying the relationships between rays and virtual sources, as well as the conditions necessary for observing interference.
Participants generally agree on the basic definitions and relationships between rays and virtual sources, but there are ongoing questions and some confusion regarding the geometry of the biprism and the conditions for interference. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding the necessity of the prism's alignment with the slit.
There are unresolved questions about the precise geometry of the biprism and the implications of its angles on the formation of virtual sources and interference patterns. Some assumptions about the behavior of rays and the definitions of prisms are not fully clarified.
Students and enthusiasts of optics, particularly those studying interference phenomena and the principles of light refraction in prisms, may find this discussion beneficial.
In my post 28 ,where are these two acute angles ?Bystander said:a prism with two acute angles
You've got it correctly --- the text says "two acute angled prisms joined at the bases," and the "bases" count as your black line. It's a confusing explanation of the shape of the prism, and totally irrelevant to the actual discussion of what the prism does. What it's doing in the textbook is a mystery.gracy said:I don't think it is correct
Is this the edge you are talking about.Note that line is going into the page.Bystander said:The edge that has to be parallel to the slit/source is the edge between the two surfaces that are 179 deg. from each other.
Where does refracting edges of both prism(which combine to form biprism) go?Bystander said:. Actually, there are no refracting edges -
Try to avoid classifying in that way. It's all diffraction. Interference is just a simplification in which you can identify isolated sources rather than continuous ones. The calculations are just easier for Interference situations.gracy said:This
Fresnel's biprism experiment is for interference not diffraction ,right?