Engineering Calculating the DC value of the output voltage for a full wave rectifier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of DC output voltage for a full wave rectifier, clarifying the distinction between root-mean-square (RMS) voltage and average (DC) voltage. It is emphasized that RMS is not equivalent to DC, as RMS measures heat generation in resistors while DC represents the average value of the waveform. The conversation also addresses the impact of filters on peak voltage, noting that the peak voltage observed without a filter may differ from that with a filter due to the charging behavior of the filter capacitor. Participants suggest that students may rely on simplifying assumptions in their calculations, but real-world applications can be complex and nonlinear. Ultimately, understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately determining the DC output voltage and ripple factor in rectifier circuits.
JC2000
Messages
186
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
In a full wave bridge rectifier circuit having 230V, 50Hz at the primary input of a transformer, the peak value of the output voltage without filter is found to be 25 Volts. Calculate the (a) DC value of the output voltage with filter and (b) Value of capacitance needed for a ripple factor of 0.004 at IL= 0.5 mA
Relevant Equations
Without filter:
##V_{dc} = \frac{2*V_p}{ pi }##
##V_{rms} = \frac{V_p}{\sqrt{2}}##

With filter :

##V_{dc} = \frac{4fCR_L*V_p}{1 + 4fCR_L} ##
I need help with part (a)... I know that the root-mean-square voltage is the dc-equivalent voltage for an AC waveform and what my book labels "##V_{dc}## is actually the average voltage. Hence I am assuming the question is asking me to find ##V_{rms}## ...

Is my assumption that the root-mean-square voltage and average voltage of a full wave rectifier with filter are the same correct?! If so, solving the problem becomes easy since we can find ##V_{rms}## without filter using the peak voltage, which will remain the same when a filter is introduced to the circuit...

For part (b), since we now know ##V_{rms}## and the load current, we can apply Ohm's law and find out the load resistance. Then use the following equation to find the capacitance :

##Ripple Factor = \frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}fCR_L}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Hope I'm not giving away too much here.)
Hint: calculate the output characteristics based on the peak voltage.
 
JC2000 said:
I know that the root-mean-square voltage is the dc-equivalent voltage for an AC waveform and what my book labels "Vdc is actually the average voltage.
No, RMS isn't "equivalent" to DC, I'm sorry someone led you to believe that. The RMS value of a waveform is a way of calculating the amount of heat generated in lossy components (resistors). It is commonly used to characterize AC waveforms.

RMS = "root mean square" ## = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T{v(t)^2} dt} = \sqrt{ave(v(t)^2)}##

DC = average value ## = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T{v(t)} dt = ave(v(t))##

If v(t) is a constant "DC", then the two calculations have the same result. Purely AC waveforms have a DC value (average value) of 0. But, for example, a unipolar square wave (pulses between 0 and 1) has different values for DC and RMS.
 
Tom.G said:
(Hope I'm not giving away too much here.)
Hint: calculate the output characteristics based on the peak voltage.
If I understand correctly, there are equations that relate the dc output voltage to the peak voltage, however I am not sure if the peak voltage value when the circuit does not have a filter can be used to calculate the dc output voltage when there is a filter...

I simulated two circuits with and without a filter (keeping everything else the same) and noticed that peak voltage seems to differ between the two hence I am not sure if it would be correct to use peak voltage (without filter) to calculate dc output voltage (with filter)...
 
DaveE said:
No, RMS isn't "equivalent" to DC, I'm sorry someone led you to believe that. The RMS value of a waveform is a way of calculating the amount of heat generated in lossy components (resistors). It is commonly used to characterize AC waveforms.

RMS = "root mean square" ## = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T{v(t)^2} dt} = \sqrt{ave(v(t)^2)}##

DC = average value ## = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T{v(t)} dt = ave(v(t))##

If v(t) is a constant "DC", then the two calculations have the same result. Purely AC waveforms have a DC value (average value) of 0. But, for example, a unipolar square wave (pulses between 0 and 1) has different values for DC and RMS.
I see! Tbh, the distinction was fuzzy when I posted the question, thank you for clearing things up!
Just to be clear, this would mean that the question wants me to find out ##V_{DC}## for the ripple in the output?
 
JC2000 said:
I see! Tbh, the distinction was fuzzy when I posted the question, thank you for clearing things up!
Just to be clear, this would mean that the question wants me to find out ##V_{DC}## for the ripple in the output?
a) Find the DC (average) output voltage of the filtered rectifier.
b) Find the capacitor value required to achieve the stated ripple factor. Ripple factor is the ratio of the AC only part of the waveform (the waveform with the average value subtracted), expressed as RMS, to the DC value of the waveform. Note that the RMS value of the waveform is different than the AC RMS value since the latter has the DC component removed before the RMS calculation.
 
AC RMS = RMS after the DC component is subtracted ## = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T{(v(t)-ave(v(t)))^2} dt} = \sqrt{ ave[(v(t)-ave[v(t)])^2]}##
 
Last edited:
JC2000 said:
I simulated two circuits with and without a filter (keeping everything else the same) and noticed that peak voltage seems to differ between the two hence I am not sure if it would be correct to use peak voltage (without filter) to calculate dc output voltage (with filter)...
That is because:
1) the filter capacitor charges only when the peak rectifier voltage exceeds the capacitor voltage
2) this results in a high peak current into the capacitor, instead of the current being spread out over the whole waveform
3) the high peak current thru the rectifier and transformer impedance causes a higher voltage drop in them

Therefore, the peak voltage into the filter is smaller.

Cheers,
Tom
 
Tom.G said:
That is because:
1) the filter capacitor charges only when the peak rectifier voltage exceeds the capacitor voltage
2) this results in a high peak current into the capacitor, instead of the current being spread out over the whole waveform
3) the high peak current thru the rectifier and transformer impedance causes a higher voltage drop in them

Therefore, the peak voltage into the filter is smaller.

Cheers,
Tom
Yes, I agree. But I suspect that for students they will use some simplifying assumptions, like the capacitor charging without loading the transformer. Back in the day when Spice was a pain to use, I used the appendix in the old National semi audio/radio handbook. I still think it's one of the best references for this sort of design. In the real world, it's a difficult circuit, very non-linear.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top