Calculating the expectation value for a particles energy in a 1_D well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of a particle's energy in a one-dimensional potential well, specifically focusing on the mathematical framework and interpretation of quantum mechanics principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the expectation value using the operator formalism and question the validity of the wave function provided. There are attempts to clarify the differentiation process and the steps involved in finding eigenvalues and wave functions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on mathematical steps and the interpretation of terms. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of the Hamiltonian operator and the expectation value, but there is no consensus on the correct approach or understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of unclear documentation and potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of operators and wave functions. Participants are also navigating the terminology and steps required for solving the problem, indicating a need for further clarification on the expectations of the assignment.

solas99
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
expectation value for a particle in a 1-D well

how do i calculate the expectation value for the particles energy in a 1-D well.

i have attached a word file, with my working out, just not quite sure if I am on the right track...

i appreciate any help...thanks a mill
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Erm, unless it means something else, L_z is an operator, not something you'd find in a wave function. So that wave function doesn't really make sense.
 
I can't really read that document at all, the equations are extremely blurry and I can't make out the symbols. However, recall that the expectation value for a given operator is the following:

<br /> \langle Q_{op}\rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi^{*} Q_{op} \Psi dx<br />
 


can you explain to me what you did not understand from the question or my working out...so i can clear it up..

Lz is not an operator, its just part of the function to describe the the particle in a 1D well.
 


have a hand written version attached..
 

Attachments

  • Photo on 14-08-2012 at 19.57.jpg
    Photo on 14-08-2012 at 19.57.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 549


Your calculation of ##\hat{H}\psi## isn't correct in both of your attempts. I'm not sure how you're getting your result. Do you know how to calculate a derivative?
 
i know how to calculate the derivative, can you please guide me.

thanks a mill
 
If you know how to differentiate, can you explain how you got your results?
 
Im not sure if I am doing it right,
what are the steps of solving this problem,

1st. find a eigen value of hamiltonian
2. find the time dependence wave function for stationary states
am i right..

can you please guide me through it
 

Attachments

  • Photo on 15-08-2012 at 13.13.jpg
    Photo on 15-08-2012 at 13.13.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 531
Last edited:
  • #10
As Clever-Name implied above, you want to calculate ##\langle \psi \lvert \hat{H} \rvert \psi \rangle##, so calculating ##\hat{H}\psi(z)## is a good first step. You have
$$\hat{H}\psi(z) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dz^2} \sqrt{\frac{10}{L_z}}\left(1-\frac{z^2}{L_z^2}\right).$$ So far so good. The problem is, the rest of what you wrote doesn't make sense. First, you claimed
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dz^2} \sqrt{\frac{10}{L_z}}\left(1-\frac{z^2}{L_z^2}\right) \rightarrow -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{n^2\pi^2}{L_z}\left(1-\frac{z^2}{L_z^2}\right)$$ which is simply wrong. This is basic differentiation. I don't understand how you got your result if you know how to calculate a derivative. Next, you then somehow claim that your answer is of the form
$$E\sqrt{\frac{10}{L_z}}\left(-\frac{z^2}{L_z^2}\right)$$ which is obviously inconsistent with what you wrote earlier (what happened to the 1 inside the parentheses?). In fact, the relationship ##\hat{H}\psi = E\psi## only holds if ##\psi## is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, and the given wave function isn't an eigenstate.

You never said what the actual potential here is. I'm assuming you have an infinite square well as opposed to a finite square well.
 
  • #11
i have attached a file with integration of wavefunction.

so i integrated the wavefunction, I am just not sure of the steps.

for example> if i want to work out the expectation value of energy. what exact steps do i follow..

im just confused with the terminology of what I am asked.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K