Calculating the Isotope Ratio of Uranium 235 and 238 4.5 Billion Years Ago

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotopes Uranium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the isotope ratio of Uranium-235 (##^{235}U##) and Uranium-238 (##^{238}U##) 4.5 billion years ago, using their current proportions of 0.72% and 99.28%, respectively. The half-lives are established as 7.04 billion years for ##^{235}U## and 4.468 billion years for ##^{238}U##. The calculations involve the equations ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## and the ratios derived from current isotope distributions. The final ratio calculated is ##A=3.30B##, indicating that the abundance of ##^{235}U## was significantly lower in the past compared to ##^{238}U##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts.
  • Familiarity with exponential decay equations, specifically ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}##.
  • Knowledge of isotope ratios and their significance in nuclear chemistry.
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations and ratios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Uranium isotope ratios in radiometric dating techniques.
  • Study the decay chains of Uranium isotopes and their relevance in nuclear physics.
  • Learn about the applications of isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) in geochemistry.
  • Explore the historical context of Uranium isotopes in the formation of Earth and its geological processes.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in nuclear chemistry, geochemistry, and radiometric dating, as well as anyone interested in the historical abundance of Uranium isotopes on Earth.

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Current share of Uranium isotope on Earth is 99.28% (##^{238}U##) and 0.72% (##^{235}U##), half-life times are ##7.04\cdot 10^8 years## (##^{235}U##) and ##4.468\cdot 10^9 years## (##^{238}U##). Calculate the ratio between the isotopes ##4.5\cdot 10^9 years## ago.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If hope it is ok to say that ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}##.

Let's now say that ##N_{238}(t)=Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}## where ##\lambda =\frac{t_{1/2}^{238}}{ln2}## and
##N_{235}(t)=Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}## where ##\mu =\frac{t_{1/2}^{235}}{ln2}##.

Now we know that ##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.9928## and also ##\frac{N_{235}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.0072##

Knowing this, I can write:

##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=\frac{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.9928## and

##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072##

Dividing last two gives me:

##\frac{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}}{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}## and

##A=Be^{-t/\mu +t/\lambda }\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}##

Inserting this into ##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072## leaves me with the result that ##B=1##.

Knowing this also gives me a result for ##A##, therefore ##A=459.8##.

So... If I am not mistaken, than following ratios should be the result I am searching:

##\frac{B}{B+A}=0.9978## for Uranium 235 and ##\frac{A}{B+A}=0.0022## for Uranium 238.

Which to me is a bit confusing, so I would kindly ask somebody to tell me where I got it all wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inserting this into ##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072## leaves me with the result that ##B=1##
Is not correct. It leaves you with the result that 0.0072 = 0.0072, which is not extremely useful.

B = 1 is a strange answer anyway, right ?
And: you should become suspicious when your answer stipulates that the fastest decaying isotope was less abundant in the past than the other one!

And now for some more constructive stuff:
First you want to check that 238U doesn't decay into 235U, which it doesn't.
So both can be considered independent.

You have expressions for the current ratio N238 / N235.
With ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## you also have expressions for ##N(t)/N_0## for both.
All you have to do is fill in the numbers !
 
BvU said:
You have expressions for the current ratio N238 / N235.
With ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## you also have expressions for ##N(t)/N_0## for both.
All you have to do is fill in the numbers !

Fill in the numbers into what? O.o

All I have is ##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.9928## and ##\frac{N_{235}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.0072##, of course dividing those two brings me to current ratio, just like you said but... ?

I don't get it what the next step is supposed to be..
 
You reached the equation
##A=Be^{-t/\mu +t/\lambda }\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}##
which is correct. You should now plug in the known values for t, λ, and μ. and solve for A/B.
 
Ok...

##A=3.30B##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K