Calculating the Rate of Mass Falling Over an Area

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Time Unit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the rate of mass falling over a specified area due to dust particles, incorporating concepts of velocity and density within the context of fluid dynamics or kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass, density, area, and velocity, questioning how velocity contributes to the calculation of mass over time. There is an attempt to clarify the dimensional analysis of the involved quantities.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the dimensional analysis of the variables involved, suggesting that the relationship holds dimensionally. There is an ongoing exploration of the physical interpretation of the variables and their interactions.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of typographical errors in the posts, which may affect clarity. The discussion also reflects an assumption that the relationship between density, area, and velocity is understood, but participants are still seeking deeper clarification.

physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

physiker99 said:
Assume there is an area S. Then we have dust particles falling over it having velocity v and density rho.
Is is correct to state mass falling over the S in unit time equals (rho)*(S)*v?

Hi physiker99! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Yes. :smile:
I guess it should be correct, because mass shouldn't have velocity component if none other cancels it.

If you mean that, dimensionally, the 1/L3 in the M/L3 in rho has to be converted to 1/T, then that's correct.
 
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.
 
physiker99 said:
I did a typo there. I don't understand how velocity is used to calculate mass.

It's not purely to calculate the mass. It also determines the rate per unit time through an area S. So you can rewrite S and v as:
[tex]Sv = S\frac{dr}{dt} = \frac{dV}{dt}[/tex]
, with V a volume

The physical interpretation is that a volume V moves through an area S in dt time. See it as moving a cube through a square hole in dt time. The density is defined as mass per volume. So you can rewrite:
[tex]\rho \frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{d\rho V}{dt} = \frac{dM}{dt}[/tex]
, with M the mass
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

I'll just add this to what D.R. :smile: says:

dimensionally, rho is M/L3, S is L2, and V is L/T

so multiply them all together, and you get M/L3 x L2 x L/T, = M/T, which is mass per time. :wink:

oh, and welcome to PF, D.R.! :smile:
 
It's understood. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K