Calculating the waste heat of Carnot engine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the waste heat of a Carnot engine, with an initial waste heat estimate of 7405.9 J, which was later corrected to 6470 J. The efficiency was calculated as 0.35481 using the temperatures converted to Kelvin. Participants emphasized the importance of using the correct formulas for efficiency, specifically e = 1 - Qout/Qin, to avoid algebraic errors. It was suggested to solve the problem without numerical values for clarity and accuracy. The conversation highlights the need for precise expressions in thermodynamic calculations to ensure correct results.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
e=1-(Tc/Th)

e=W/Qin

e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout
The answer is 6470 J.

So since I have the two temperatures I could calculate the efficiency. First I convert to kelvin then get an efficiency of 0.35481. Now I can use e=W/Qin to get Qin. I get a value of 10033.54J.

Now I can use e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout to get Qout, the waste heat. I get 7405.9 J.

Overview of calculations:

e=1-(295.66/458.25)=0.35481

Qin=W/e=3560/0.35481=10033.54 J

Qout=Qin/(e+1) = 10033.54/(1.35481) = 7405.9 J but answer is 6470 J.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    9.8 KB · Views: 179
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you messed up the algebra. I agree with your number for the efficiency but not with one of your expressions for it. For best results, try solving this without numbers, a recommendation that was made to you before.
You have ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}## and ##e=\dfrac{W}{Q_{in}}##. Can you eliminate ##Q_{in}## and get an expression relating ##Q_{out}## to ##e## and ##W?##
 
kuruman said:
It looks like you messed up the algebra. I agree with your number for the efficiency. Try solving this without numbers, a recommendation that you have so far ignored.
You have ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}## and ##e=\dfrac{W}{Q_{in}}##. Can you eliminate ##Q_{in}## get an expression relating ##Q_{out}## to ##e## and ##W?##

Qin=W/e so

e=1-Qout/(W/e)

e=1-eQout/W

1-e=eQout/W

(1-e)W/e = Qout

(1-0.35481)*3560/0.35481

Youre right, must have messed up my algebra somewhere because this gives the right answer.

Thanks.
 
JoeyBob said:
Youre right, must have messed up my algebra somewhere because this gives the right answer.
It's not the algebra, it's this: e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout.

When Qout = 0 you should expect efficiency of 1. Your expresion does not predict that. That is why I prefer to write it as ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}.## It reduces to 1 when no heat is wasted. I am mentioning this so that you will write the correct expression next time.
 
I would never go to the efficiency to solve this. I would write $$Q_{in}-Q_{out}=W$$ and $$\frac{Q_{in}}{T_{hot}}-\frac{Q_{out}}{T_{cold}}=0$$This is two linear algebraic equations in two unknowns.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top