Calculating the waste heat of Carnot engine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The waste heat of a Carnot engine was calculated to be 6470 J, despite initial calculations suggesting 7405.9 J. The efficiency was determined to be 0.35481 using the formula e=1-(T_c/T_h), where T_c is the cold temperature (295.66 K) and T_h is the hot temperature (458.25 K). The correct expression for waste heat, Q_out, was derived as Q_out = (1-e)W/e, confirming the accurate waste heat value. The discussion emphasized the importance of algebraic manipulation in thermodynamic calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Carnot engine principles
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic efficiency calculations
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation in physics
  • Basic concepts of heat transfer and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Carnot efficiency formulas
  • Learn about the implications of waste heat in thermodynamic cycles
  • Explore linear algebra applications in thermodynamics
  • Investigate real-world applications of Carnot engines and their efficiencies
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in optimizing energy efficiency in thermal systems.

JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
e=1-(Tc/Th)

e=W/Qin

e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout
The answer is 6470 J.

So since I have the two temperatures I could calculate the efficiency. First I convert to kelvin then get an efficiency of 0.35481. Now I can use e=W/Qin to get Qin. I get a value of 10033.54J.

Now I can use e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout to get Qout, the waste heat. I get 7405.9 J.

Overview of calculations:

e=1-(295.66/458.25)=0.35481

Qin=W/e=3560/0.35481=10033.54 J

Qout=Qin/(e+1) = 10033.54/(1.35481) = 7405.9 J but answer is 6470 J.
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    9.8 KB · Views: 189
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you messed up the algebra. I agree with your number for the efficiency but not with one of your expressions for it. For best results, try solving this without numbers, a recommendation that was made to you before.
You have ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}## and ##e=\dfrac{W}{Q_{in}}##. Can you eliminate ##Q_{in}## and get an expression relating ##Q_{out}## to ##e## and ##W?##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
kuruman said:
It looks like you messed up the algebra. I agree with your number for the efficiency. Try solving this without numbers, a recommendation that you have so far ignored.
You have ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}## and ##e=\dfrac{W}{Q_{in}}##. Can you eliminate ##Q_{in}## get an expression relating ##Q_{out}## to ##e## and ##W?##

Qin=W/e so

e=1-Qout/(W/e)

e=1-eQout/W

1-e=eQout/W

(1-e)W/e = Qout

(1-0.35481)*3560/0.35481

Youre right, must have messed up my algebra somewhere because this gives the right answer.

Thanks.
 
JoeyBob said:
Youre right, must have messed up my algebra somewhere because this gives the right answer.
It's not the algebra, it's this: e=(Qin-Qout)/Qout.

When Qout = 0 you should expect efficiency of 1. Your expresion does not predict that. That is why I prefer to write it as ##e=1-\dfrac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}.## It reduces to 1 when no heat is wasted. I am mentioning this so that you will write the correct expression next time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JoeyBob
I would never go to the efficiency to solve this. I would write $$Q_{in}-Q_{out}=W$$ and $$\frac{Q_{in}}{T_{hot}}-\frac{Q_{out}}{T_{cold}}=0$$This is two linear algebraic equations in two unknowns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K