Calculating Time and Velocity in One-Dimensional Kinematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScienceGeek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a motorist and a police officer in pursuit, focusing on time and velocity calculations in one-dimensional motion. The original poster presents their attempts to solve the problem, including unit conversions and the application of kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply kinematic equations to find the time and velocity of the police officer. Some participants suggest writing separate formulas for the positions of both the motorist and the officer to determine when these positions will be equal.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the relationship between the velocities of the two vehicles and the conditions under which the police officer catches the motorist. Guidance has been offered regarding setting up equations based on distance covered, and the original poster reports checking their answers against a textbook.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of not assuming that both vehicles have the same velocity at the moment of capture, and there is a reminder about adhering to forum guidelines regarding the provision of full solutions.

ScienceGeek
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am reviewing General Physics for the MCAT and have a question regarding kinematics in one dimension. The question reads as follows:

A speeding motorist traveling 120 km/h passes a stationary police officer. The officer immediately begins pursuit at a constant acceleration of 10.0 km/h/s. How much time will it take for the police officer to reach the speeder, assuming that the speeder maintains a constant speed? How fast will the police officer be traveling at this time?
I am unsure how to solve this problem, conceptually speaking. I converted the mixed units to units compatible with m/s. My calculated values are as follows:

Vmotorist = 33 m/s
V0cop = 0 m/s
V cop = ?
Acop = 2.8 m/s2
T = ?

I have used the following kinematics equations:
V2 = V02 + 2a∆X
V = V0 + aT
X = X0 + V0T + ½ aT2

I calculated the time it would take the cop to reach 33 m/s and the distance at that time:
V= V0 + aT X = X0 + V0T + ½ aT2
33 m/s = (2.8 m/s2)*t = ½ * 2.8 * 11.82
T = 11.8 s = 194.9 m

I also calculated the difference in distance between the motorist and the cop at this point (194.5 m) however I am unsure as to whether or not these values are even relevant. Any assistance with the direction I should go into solve these questions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this. Write separate formulas for the position of each as a function of time. When will those positions be equal?
 
ScienceGeek said:
I am reviewing General Physics for the MCAT and have a question regarding kinematics in one dimension. The question reads as follows:

A speeding motorist traveling 120 km/h passes a stationary police officer. The officer immediately begins pursuit at a constant acceleration of 10.0 km/h/s. How much time will it take for the police officer to reach the speeder, assuming that the speeder maintains a constant speed? How fast will the police officer be traveling at this time?
I am unsure how to solve this problem, conceptually speaking. I converted the mixed units to units compatible with m/s. My calculated values are as follows:

Vmotorist = 33 m/s
V0cop = 0 m/s
V cop = ?
Acop = 2.8 m/s2
T = ?
Ok, good.

Now, you want to find the time at which the cop will catch the speeder. At this time the displacement from the starting point of the cop of each car will be equal (otherwise, he wouldn't have caught him!) You tried to say that when the cop catches the speeder, both of their velocities are the same-- this is incorrect.

So, can you write an expression for the distance covered by each car? [Hint: leave x and t as v unknown variables]

If you can do this, then you will have set up two equations in two unknowns; you can solve these for x and t.
 
cuddlesome: here at PF we try to give tutorial advice, and guide students through questions. Please refrain from posting full solutions in future, as per the PF guidelines to homework help.
 
Thank you all! I set the distance equations equal to each other, eliminating X as a variable essentially and solving for t. I checked my answers with those provided in the back of the book and they were correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K