Calculating Time, Where Did I Go Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NafeesR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
NafeesR
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child accidentally drops her doll from a bridge suspended 50m above a fast moving river. Assuming the doll never reaches terminal velocity, how many seconds will it take for the doll to hit the water?

Homework Equations


x=x0+ v0t + 0.5*at2

The Attempt at a Solution


Using acceleration formula: x=x0+ v0t + 0.5*at2
It should be 0=(50M)+(0m/s)t+0.5*(-9.8m/s2)
Which would give me 3.194382825 seconds. The textbook's answer is 2.3s. So after a bit of exploration I realized that the acceleration isn't supposed to be halved. That brings me to the question why isn't the acceleration halved like the example and other questions using the formula?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
NafeesR said:

Homework Statement


A child accidentally drops her doll from a bridge suspended 50m above a fast moving river. Assuming the doll never reaches terminal velocity, how many seconds will it take for the doll to hit the water?

Homework Equations


x=x0+ v0t + 0.5*at2

The Attempt at a Solution


Using acceleration formula: x=x0+ v0t + 0.5*at2
It should be 0=(50M)+(0m/s)t+0.5*(-9.8m/s2)
Which would give me 3.194382825 seconds. The textbook's answer is 2.3s. So after a bit of exploration I realized that the acceleration isn't supposed to be halved. That brings me to the question why isn't the acceleration halved like the example and other questions using the formula?

Your answer is right (though you made a typo error and forgot a "t" in your equation.)
The factor 1/2 in front of the acceleration comes from integration.