Calculating torque about a point with given forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating torque about point A with given forces of 100 N and 50 N. The angles for these forces were calculated as 36.870 degrees and 67.380 degrees, respectively. The net torque was computed using the formula τ = rF, resulting in a value of -274.808 Nm, which differs from the textbook answer of -295 Nm. Participants noted potential errors in the provided worksheet and suggested using right triangle ratios for a more straightforward calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations and the formula τ = rF
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and arctangent
  • Familiarity with right triangle ratios
  • Basic physics concepts related to forces and moments
NEXT STEPS
  • Review torque calculations in physics textbooks or online resources
  • Learn about the implications of negative torque values
  • Study the use of right triangle ratios in physics problems
  • Explore common errors in torque problems and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in mastering torque calculations and problem-solving techniques.

Nova_Chr0n0
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
What is the net torque around point A?
Relevant Equations
τ = rF
wew1.JPG

I've inserted a photo of the figure, hope everyone can see it.

SOLUTION:
1. I first solved for the angle of 100 N and 50 N since I need the force that is perpendicular to point A.
>> Angle of 100 N
theta = arctan(3/4)
theta = 36.870 degree
>> Angle of 50 N
theta = arctan(12/5)
theta = 67.380 degree
2. Solving for the net torque on point A where counter-clockwise is + and clockwise is -
τ = rF
τ_A = -1[100sin(36.870)] - 1.75(70) - 2[50sin(67.380)]
τ_A = -274.808 Nm

My final answer for the torque at point A is -274.808 Nm, but when I check the answer in the textbook, it is -295 Nm. I am confused about what part I did wrong. Also, I'm new to the forum, so if my format is not understandable, kindly inform me about it. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Finding the angles was rather unnecessary since you are given the right triangle ratios. You could just write 100N x 1m x (3/5) etc.
But I get the same answer as you do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nova_Chr0n0
Well, I've got 274.8 as well, though my solution is somewhat less convolute than yours.

Is there anything else to the question ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nova_Chr0n0
haruspex said:
Finding the angles was rather unnecessary since you are given the right triangle ratios. You could just write 100N x 1m x (3/5) etc.
But I get the same answer as you do.
I guess there was just an error in the given answer for the file that I've encountered. Also, thanks for letting me know a solution with less work when involving triangle ratios. Really appreciate it!
 
Nova_Chr0n0 said:
I guess there was just an error in the given answer for the file that I've encountered. Also, thanks for letting me know a solution with less work when involving triangle ratios. Really appreciate it!
Welcome, @Nova_Chr0n0 !

That dimension of 1 m to the right of the figure suggests that either a force that is applied at the right end, or the weight of the 3-meter bar, is missing.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Nova_Chr0n0

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K