Calculating Torque around moving Centre of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the distribution of forces on a man's feet while he stands on a railroad car rounding a turn. The scenario includes considerations of torque, forces in radial and vertical directions, and the dynamics of the center of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for an additional equation from the sum of torques and question which axis to use for this calculation. There is exploration of whether to calculate torques around the center of mass or another point, considering the implications of acceleration on the center of mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that choosing different axes can yield different equations but ultimately lead to the same result. There is mention of the potential benefits of selecting an axis through the center of mass to simplify the equations by excluding certain forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the man is not rotating, and there is discussion about the relevance of forces acting through the chosen axis, as well as the implications of the system being non-inertial due to acceleration.

sunquick
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man of mass M stands on a railroad car which is rounding an unbanked turn of radius R at speed v. His center of mass is height L above the car, and his feet are distance d apart. The man is facing the direction of motion . How much weight is on each of his feet?

Homework Equations


Sum of forces in the radial direction: -f1-f2 = m v^2 / R
Sum of forces n the vertical direction: -W+ N1 + N2 = 0
Sum of torques = 0

3. The Attempt at a Solution

f1 and f2 are the reaction forces on each foot of the man in the radial direction, N1 and N2 are the reaction forces on each of the man's feet in the vertical (up) direction and are balanced by the weight of the man.
I need to get an extra equation from the sum of torques around some axis of rotation, but I don't understand which axis it is. The man is not spinning in any direction, but I0m trying to get an equation for the torques caused by N1 and N2 at some distance from a point through the axis of (no-)rotation. Can I calculate the torques around the tangent to the trajectory of motion that goes trough the center of mass, even though the center of mass is being accelerated and therefore isn't an inertial frame of reference? Should I go an try to sum the torques using the center of the curve as the origin of the coordinates, since that is stationary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunquick said:
I need to get an extra equation from the sum of torques around some axis of rotation, but I don't understand which axis it is...snip.. I'm trying to get an equation for the torques caused by N1 and N2 at some distance from a point through the axis of (no-)rotation.

You can pick almost any axis, for example you could pick his centre of mass or one foot. You will get a different equation but after solving all the simultaneous equations the result should be the same.

If you picked his centre of mass you would get torques due to f1, f2, N1, N2.
 
PS: It's sometimes helpful to pick an axis that has an unknown force acting through it. That way the unknown force won't feature in the equation. For example the equation that sums the torques about the centre of mass won't contain terms for "w" or "mv^2/r" because they act through the centre of mass. In short careful choice of the axis saves you a few steps when solving the simultaneous equations.
 
I assume it is not necessary to consider forces f1 and f2. This would be redundant as N1 and N2 are needed. I would choose an axis which would go through the centre point between man's feet perpendicular to the radius and the direction of gravity force(so that torques of N1 N2 and centrifugal forces are non-zero). As there is no rotation about this axis, the total torque must be zero. This equation accompanied by the second law will give you the solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K