Calculating torque on a wheelchair

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hovda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required to push a manual wheelchair with a person uphill at a specified angle. Participants explore the implications of the calculation and the design considerations for a gear reducer intended to assist in climbing steep inclines.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a torque calculation formula: Torque = RadiusOfWheel * MassOfSystem * gravity * sin(30), yielding a torque of 323.73 Nm for a system mass of 110 kg.
  • There is a question regarding whether rolling resistance should be considered in the torque calculation.
  • Another participant comments on the feasibility of climbing a 30-degree slope in a wheelchair, suggesting that typical wheelchair access grades are much lower, around 5 degrees.
  • The original poster clarifies that the angle was arbitrary and emphasizes the goal of the gear design is to reduce the force needed to climb steep hills.
  • A later reply confirms that the torque calculation presented is correct.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of climbing a 30-degree slope in a wheelchair, with some emphasizing practical limitations while others focus on the theoretical aspects of the torque calculation. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the implications of the angle chosen for the calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the angle of 30 degrees may not reflect practical scenarios for wheelchair use, and there is an acknowledgment of the need to consider rolling resistance in torque calculations, though this remains unresolved.

Hovda
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I would like to apologize in advance, for my english.

I am working on a gear reducer for a manual wheelchair, and are trying to figure out what kind of design I think would work. But as I am calculating there are a few (simple) things I could need some help with.

As a test I've chosen a "wheelchair + person - system" with a total mass of 110 kg (95 for the person and 15 for chair and wheels). I am simply trying to calculate the torque needed to push this system 30 degrees uphill, and this is where I have a couple of questions:

When calculating the tourqe, is it enough just to use Tourque = RadiusOfWheel * MassOfSystem * gravity * sin(30) ? In my case this gives me T = 0.6m * 110 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 * sin(30) = 323,73 Nm. Devided by two wheels the torque would be 161,865 Nm.

I'm wondering if this is the correct way to do it? As these are wheels, do I have to take the rolling into account when calculating the tourque? All the books I have are in English, and believe it or not, it is not always easy to find the correct (relevant) information as English is not my fist language :) .

I need the tourque to be able to design gears that would do the job.

I know these questions might seem simple, but I would really appreciate if someone could give me some pointers here.

And if everything is completely off, let me know!Thank you!Mats
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hovda said:
Hi!

I would like to apologize in advance, for my english.

I am working on a gear reducer for a manual wheelchair, and are trying to figure out what kind of design I think would work. But as I am calculating there are a few (simple) things I could need some help with.

As a test I've chosen a "wheelchair + person - system" with a total mass of 110 kg (95 for the person and 15 for chair and wheels). I am simply trying to calculate the torque needed to push this system 30 degrees uphill, and this is where I have a couple of questions:

When calculating the tourqe, is it enough just to use Tourque = RadiusOfWheel * MassOfSystem * gravity * sin(30) ? In my case this gives me T = 0.6m * 110 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 * sin(30) = 323,73 Nm. Devided by two wheels the torque would be 161,865 Nm.

I'm wondering if this is the correct way to do it? As these are wheels, do I have to take the rolling into account when calculating the tourque? All the books I have are in English, and believe it or not, it is not always easy to find the correct (relevant) information as English is not my fist language :) .

I need the tourque to be able to design gears that would do the job.

I know these questions might seem simple, but I would really appreciate if someone could give me some pointers here.

And if everything is completely off, let me know!Thank you!Mats
I must say it's rather ambitious for a person to try to climb a 30-degree slope in a wheelchair without any assist.

Most of the grades I have seen specified for wheelchair access are limited to about 1:12, or say 5 degrees maximum.

Even the famously steep streets in San Francisco max out at about 17.5 degrees.

http://www.datapointed.net/2009/11/the-steeps-of-san-francisco/
 
SteamKing said:
I must say it's rather ambitious for a person to try to climb a 30-degree slope in a wheelchair without any assist.

Most of the grades I have seen specified for wheelchair access are limited to about 1:12, or say 5 degrees maximum.

Even the famously steep streets in San Francisco max out at about 17.5 degrees.

http://www.datapointed.net/2009/11/the-steeps-of-san-francisco/
Hi!

Yes, I know 30 degrees is a lot, but the number of degrees is not the point itself. It was simply a "random" number i put in. Allthough the point of the gear i am designing, is just that it should be able to reduce the "force" needed to climb so much that one could get up steep hills. But anyways, again, the degrees is not the point here :)

But thank you for pointing it out :)

Mats
 
Hovda said:
Hi!

Yes, I know 30 degrees is a lot, but the number of degrees is not the point itself. It was simply a "random" number i put in. Allthough the point of the gear i am designing, is just that it should be able to reduce the "force" needed to climb so much that one could get up steep hills. But anyways, again, the degrees is not the point here :)

But thank you for pointing it out :)

Mats
Whew! It's a good thing you didn't pull out a number like 90 degrees, or even more.

Good design should account for what is feasible versus what is not.
 
Your torque calculation is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K