Calculating torque with buyouant force and hardly definiable arm

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter losbellos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arm Force Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque on a submerged half tube containing air, specifically focusing on the effects of buoyant force and the challenges of defining the arm for torque calculation. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of torque in this context, including the roles of buoyancy and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is valid to approximate torque by dividing the tube's volume into segments and using their distances to the center of rotation.
  • Another participant notes that the total buoyant force acts through the center of buoyancy, which is the center of mass of the displaced fluid.
  • A different participant suggests that the torque due to buoyancy can be simplified similarly to how torque due to gravity is calculated, with both forces acting through their respective centers (mass and buoyancy).
  • There is a mention that the exact position of the center of mass depends on the density of the tube's walls, which adds complexity to the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of approximating torque in this scenario, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider both buoyant force and gravitational torque, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the exact positioning of the center of mass and center of buoyancy, which may affect the calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying fluid mechanics, buoyancy, and torque calculations in physics, particularly in contexts involving submerged objects.

losbellos
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hej Guy,

Here I am again with a question on torque basically.

Please see the image below.

I have a half tube underwater. The tube have air inside. Now I would like to calculate the torque for this system. As you see the tube will move to a balanced position, but I don't how much torque it will have on the axis of rotation..

My question is it legal to approximate the torque as you see in the 3rd image that I divide the tube volume and use those volume segments with the distance to the center.

I am having this problem because basically inside nothing can act as an arm, but the tube have its volume and this volume have distance from the center of rotation and well the volume creating the buoyant force...

Or is it just a whole volume as a force upwards and the toque is basically the Torque =buoyant force x center-cylinder-radius ? This seems to be not valid for me.

Anybody can help me on this?
Thanks in advance!

problem.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hej losbellos! :smile:

(pleeeeeeeeeease don't post such wide pictures :redface:)
losbellos said:
… is it legal to approximate the torque as you see in the 3rd image that I divide the tube volume and use those volume segments with the distance to the center.

the total buoyant force acts through the centre of buoyancy (the centre of mass of the displaced fluid)

so the only two net forces on the tube are …

its weight, acting through the centre of mass

the buoyant force, acting through the centre of buoyancy​
 
This would be valid for calculating the torque due to bouyancy: remember also to calculate the torque in the opposite direction due to gravity.

Just as the torque due to gravity can be simplified as if the object's whole mass was positioned at its centre of mass, the torque due to bouyancy (in an incompressible fluid) can be simplified as if the object's whole bouyancy was positioned at its centre of bouyancy. Note that "bouyancy" is determined by the mass of fluid displaced, and so the centre of bouyancy is determined in the same way as the centre of mass and for an object of uniform density is at the same point.

For your object the centre of mass lies some way along the radius of the half-pipe, although exactly where depends on the density of its walls, and the centre of bouyancy lies along the same radius.
 
Why is it a post can go unanswered for 7 hours and then two people decide to post an answer at the same time (although I was slower writing mine than tiny-tim)?
 
thanks for the answers...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K