High School Calculating trigonometry without calculator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating trigonometric values without a calculator, emphasizing the memorization of key angles such as 30°, 45°, and 60°. Participants highlight methods like Taylor series and CORDIC (COordinate Rotation DIgital Computer) algorithms for efficient calculations. Historical approaches included using tables of pre-computed values and geometric constructions. The conversation also touches on the use of logarithm tables for complex arithmetic before the advent of personal computers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometric functions and their values
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their applications
  • Knowledge of CORDIC algorithms and their purpose
  • Basic concepts of logarithms and their use in calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of CORDIC algorithms in programming languages
  • Explore the derivation and applications of Taylor series in trigonometry
  • Study the historical methods of calculating trigonometric values, including the use of tables
  • Learn about advanced techniques for estimating trigonometric ratios for arbitrary angles
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying trigonometry, and anyone interested in historical and modern methods of calculating trigonometric functions.

Xforce
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Trigonometry is vital for calculating angles and lengths, but unfortunately sometimes I forgot my calculator, what should I do?
Speaking of trigonometry without a calculator, I usually only memorizes the trig values of 30°, 45° and 60°. then by I can apply basic equations and applying to polygons or other geometry shapes I can get trig values for angles like 15° Or 75°. When people have enough time, people on Wikipedia even got the exact value of any degrees divisible by 3. However, constructing a 120-sided polygon takes way too long...
In some cases, for random degrees, it usually wants to get an estimated value, not an exact value. These manual calculations usually gives off a exact value... if we combine them using equations like sin(a+b)=sina*cosb+sinb*cosa and use a trial-and-error method, until we get the number of decimals we want, it will be too complicated. Despite that, estimating a surd is also hard.
So, is it possible to efficiently calculate the estimate of a trig ratio of random numbers? How does calculators do it? And how ancient people calculate them before the invention of computers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Xforce said:
So, is it possible to efficiently calculate the estimate of a trig ratio of random numbers?
One way is to use their Taylor expansions.
How does calculators do it?
IIRC they use certain algorithms which are more efficient than Taylor, but I have forgotten which.
And how ancient people calculate them before the invention of computers?
They didn't. They only had certain values: the ratios in a right triangle with integer side lengths. Euclid's geometry is done by ruler and compass, not by numeric.
 
That depends on what you call "efficiently". The simplest concept is a Taylor series but it isn't very efficient in terms of number of calculations. A standard computer algorithm is CORDIC but that relies on tables of some pre-computed values stored somewhere.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Without a computer, there are half-angle formulas and angle sum formulas that can be used to get values. Early mathematicians used to hire idiot savants who could generate tables. The savants could not describe how they were doing the calculations in any way that a normal person could understand.
 
SLIDERULE, if you know how and if you have one
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, fresh_42 and FactChecker
fresh_42 said:
IIRC they use certain algorithms which are more efficient than Taylor, but I have forgotten which.
I believe they are called CORDIC (for COordinate Rotation DIgital Computer), aka Volder's algorithm. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CORDIC.
 
When computers were still many-millions of $, there were tables. You looked up the value closest to what you wanted in the table. If you needed more accuracy you used various standard formulas and interpolated. For certain special values or special ranges you used other formulas. Such as for very small angles and the sin() or tan() functions, or angles close to pi/2 for the cos() function.

The same general process was used for logs. There are entire books of similar tables, various other special functions as well such as Bessel functions and so on.

In public school, mumble years ago, when personal computer power simply was not available, I started in memorizing the log tables. I had read a science fiction story about a "boy scout on the moon" or some such. He had managed to solve his problem in his head by using memorized log tables. If you recall that you can multiply two numbers by taking the log of each, adding them, then getting the inverse-log, a log table in your head let's you do a lot of fairly complicated arithmetic. Sadly, my memory was not really up to the task.

Which reminds me of a joke. The forest ranger noticed that a certain kind of snake in his park was not successfully breeding. The tourists visiting the park were disturbing them at just the wrong moment, and nobody was happy about that, since the snakes were likely to be aggressive in such situations. So he invented a particular type of picnic bench-and-table that would allow the tourists to sit on it, and the snakes could safely hide in a compartment under the table and be undisturbed by the tourists. And an attractive feature of these picnic surfaces was they could be easily constructed from local materials. Thus leading to the moral of the story: log tables were invented so that adders could multiply.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary, Nik_2213 and FactChecker
In my first year at secondary school we had Miss Rankine for maths. One of the few things I can remember from that class is that the part of the logarithm after the decimal point is called the "mantissa".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K