Calculating Uncertainty in Mass of a Star Using Taylor Series Expansion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the fractional uncertainty in the mass of a star, denoted as M, which is related to the distance to the star, d, through a proportional relationship M ∝ d³. Participants are exploring the implications of this relationship and how to apply a Taylor series expansion to determine the uncertainty.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of the proportionality symbol (∝) and its implications for the relationship between mass and distance. There are discussions about the definition of fractional uncertainty and how it relates to the uncertainties in distance. Some participants are exploring the application of Taylor series expansion to express the uncertainty in mass based on the uncertainty in distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the mathematical relationships involved. There is a focus on expanding the expression for mass using Taylor series and determining how the fractional uncertainty in distance translates to that in mass. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the definitions and relationships of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the fractional uncertainty f is much less than one, and there is some confusion regarding the proper notation and definitions used in the problem statement. The exact nature of the proportionality constant and its implications for the calculations is also under discussion.

nissanztt90
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Need to calculate fractional uncertainty f, of M (mass of a star in this case), where f is much less than one. The hint i was given was all i need to know is M [tex]\alpha[/tex] d3, and use a taylor expansion to the first order in f.

M = mass of a star, d = distance to star


Homework Equations



M [tex]\alpha[/tex] d3

The Attempt at a Solution



Firstly, I am stuck at what the [tex]\alpha[/tex] means, I've never seen it used before in this sense, at least not that i remember. Cut and paste shows it to be a division sign, although that doesn't mean much. I am not very strong with taylor expansions at all. Assuming that the [tex]\alpha[/tex] is supposed to be a division sign...

f(x) = M/d3 then...

f(a) + (f`(a)/1!)(x-a) then...

M/d3 + 1/d3(x-a) would be the first order? I am guessing you take the derivative with respect to M. Would 1/d3 be my uncertainty since that is the first order? Its been awhile since i worked on taylor expansions and I am very confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The [itex]\propto[/itex] means "directly proportional to", so that the equation [itex]M(d) \propto d^3[/itex] says that [itex]M(d)[/itex] is directly proportional to [itex]d^3[/itex]. It could mean that [itex]M(d)=2.6876d^3[/itex] or [itex]M(d)=-97d^3[/itex] for example. Since you aren't told what the constant of proportionality is, just call it [itex]\kappa[/itex] so that [itex]M(d) \propto d^3 \quad \Rightarrow M(d)=\kappa d^3[/itex]

What is f supposed to be? Is it a function of M?
 
The [itex]\alpha[/itex] means "is proportional to". Alternatively, you could say

M = a d3
where "a" is a constant.

Do you know what "d" is?

I'll take an educated guess that you are to write f in terms of the fractional error in d, which you could call fd or maybe Δd/d

Another educated guess: you didn't quite copy the problem statement properly. If you are really to find f "to the first order in f", the answer is simply

f=f
 
Here is the exact question:

Lets call the fractional uncertainty on the distance to the Galactic center f, meaning that we think the true distance is with in d0 +/- fd0 (where D0 is our best guess and f is much smaller than 1). What is the fractional uncertainty on M? Hint: All you need to know is M [tex]\alpha[/tex] d3 and then use a Taylor expansion to first order in f.

If M is directly proportional to d3, then wouldn't the fractional uncertainty be proportional to f? So if fd = f, and M is proportional to d3, then would fM = f1/3?

f is the fractional uncertainty, not a function of mass or distance i don't believe.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so f is the fractional uncertainty of d, not of M as you suggested originally.

nissanztt90 said:
If M is directly proportional to d3, then wouldn't the fractional uncertainty be proportional to f? .

It is. But that does not mean they are equal. Proportional does not mean equal.

Since M α d3, see what happens when you expand

(d0 +/- fd0)3
 
So is my f(a) = (d0+/- fd0)3, then i take the first derivative with respect to f? f`(a) = +/-d0(x-a)? I am so confused by series expansion.
 
Basically you have [itex]M(d)=\kappa d^3= \kappa (d_0 \pm fd_0)^3 =\kappa d_0^3 (1 \pm f)^3[/itex]
You are given that f is much smaller than 1, so you want to do a Taylor series expansion of [itex]g(f)=(1 \pm f)^3[/itex] about the point f=0. (I'm using g here so that you don't confuse your f's)

The Taylor series of g(f) about the point f=0 is:

[tex]g(f)=g(0)+\frac{g'(0)f}{1!}+\frac{g''(0)f<br /> ^2}{2!}+\ldots[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Alright, and then the expansion to the first order would be g(0) + g'(0)f?

Tell me if I am getting this...

g(f) = (1+f)3 = (1 + 3f + 3f2 + f3)
g'(f) = (3 + 6f + 3f2)

g(f) = g(0) + g'(0)f /1! = 1 + 3f

That would be expanded to the first order f? 1 + 3f?

So whatever my fractional uncertainty is for distance, say fd, the fractional uncertainty of the mass, fm = 1 + 3fd?

BTW thank you very much for your help.
 
Your expansion is correct, however I meant to say [itex]g(f)=(1 \pm f)^3[/itex]. As you can check for yourself, the expansion of that to first order in f about f=0 is [itex]1 \pm 3f[/itex]. So substitute this into the formula for [itex]M[/itex] what do you get?
 
  • #10
The fractional uncertainty of the Mass = 1+/- 3f, where f is the fractional uncertainty of the distance? I am not sure which equation for mass your referring to since i didnt provide one initially, only the proportion, or were you talking about M(d) = a d3
 
  • #11
Use the equation [itex]M(d)=\kappa d^3= \kappa (d_0 \pm fd_0)^3 =\kappa d_0^3 (1 \pm f)^3[/itex].
Remember this comes from the fact that [itex]M[/itex] is proportional to [itex]d^3[/itex] and that [itex]d=d_0 \pm fd_0[/itex].

All that the taylor series has shown is that [itex](1\pm f)^3 \approx 1 \pm 3f[/itex]
 
  • #12
M(d) = ad3(1+/-3f), M(d) = ad3 +/- 3fad3, now do i solve for f or something?
 
  • #13
Well, you have:

[tex]M(d)=\kappa d_0^3 \pm 3f\kappa d_0^3[/tex]

Or, using [itex]M_0 \equiv M(d_o)=\kappa d_0^3[/itex]

[tex]M(d)=M_0 \pm 3fM_0[/tex]

Now, can you look at that equation and tell me what [itex]f_M[/itex] is?:wink:
 
  • #14
I hope so...its getting late here and i was up early...so here it goes...

fM= +/-3fd
 
  • #15
Yep, you got it. :)
 
  • #16
Great, thank you very much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K