Taylor expansion of the relativistic Doppler effect?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relativistic Doppler effect and the challenge of deriving a first-order Taylor expansion of the given equation. The original poster expresses difficulty in viewing the equation as a function suitable for expansion and relates it to sound wave expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the relativistic Doppler effect equation as a function for Taylor expansion. There is confusion regarding the appropriate form for expansion and whether to use binomial expansion or differentiation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications on the nature of the Taylor expansion and the equivalence of methods. There is ongoing exploration of how to apply the binomial expansion and the implications of expanding around a specific point.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a specific value for expansion, leading to questions about whether a Maclaurin series is appropriate. The context includes constraints related to the original poster's university-level work.

Amara
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[Note from mentor: this thread was originally posted in a non-homework forum, therefore it does not use the homework template.]

I have been given an equation for the relativistic doppler effect but I'm struggling to see this as a function and then give a first order Taylor expansion. Any help at all would be appreciated as I'm completely stuck.

fo/fs = √(1 + vrel/c) / √(1-vrel/c)

Where vrel is the relative speed of the source and the observer with respect to each other, c the speed of light, and vrel > 0 is here presumed to mean that the source and
the observer move towards each other. Consider the relativistic Doppler effect in the case of (vrel/c) ≪ 1, but (vrel/c) > 0. Write a first-order Taylor expansion for the relativistic Doppler effect, and show that the result is equivalent to either of the two expressions found for sound.

The expressions for sound are:

i) The source moves with speed vs towards stationary observer

fo/fs = 1 / (1-(vs/v))

ii) The observer moves with speed vo towards the stationary source

fo/fs = 1 + (vo/v)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Amara said:
I have been given an equation for the relativistic doppler effect but I'm struggling to see this as a function and then give a first order Taylor expansion. Any help at all would be appreciated as I'm completely stuck.

fo/fs = √(1 + vrel/c) / √(1-vrel/c)

Where vrel is the relative speed of the source and the observer with respect to each other, c the speed of light, and vrel > 0 is here presumed to mean that the source and
the observer move towards each other. Consider the relativistic Doppler effect in the case of (vrel/c) ≪ 1, but (vrel/c) > 0. Write a first-order Taylor expansion for the relativistic Doppler effect, and show that the result is equivalent to either of the two expressions found for sound.

The expressions for sound are:

i) The source moves with speed vs towards stationary observer

fo/fs = 1 / (1-(vs/v))

ii) The observer moves with speed vo towards the stationary source

fo/fs = 1 + (vo/v)

This should probably be in the Homework section, right? But just to put this into a more obvious form, let x = v_{rel}/c. Then you want to expand the function

F(x) = \frac{\sqrt{1+x}}{\sqrt{1-x}}

in powers of x. Do you know how to do that?
 
Sorry this is my first question. Because it's university work I thought it would go here.

I started by doing that but I got confused with not having what would be a in a normal Taylor expansion question.
 
Amara said:
Sorry this is my first question. Because it's university work I thought it would go here.

I started by doing that but I got confused with not having what would be a in a normal Taylor expansion question.

I'm not sure what you mean by a "normal Taylor expansion question". The F(x) that I gave is an ordinary function with an ordinary Taylor expansion.
 
Okay I think my Taylor expansion needs some work. But getting confirmation that it's in this form helps. Thanks
 
I still have a problem with this. In a Taylor expansion I have a value to expand about. I am not given a value for this. And the question does not ask for a Maclaurin series.
 
Amara said:
I still have a problem with this. In a Taylor expansion I have a value to expand about. I am not given a value for this. And the question does not ask for a Maclaurin series.

You're expanding F(x) = \frac{\sqrt{1+x}}{\sqrt{1-x}} about x=0. Do you know how to do that?
 
Is this a Maclaurin series?

I'm not sure because I don't know if I should use binomial expansion or differentiate withTaylor.
 
Well, they amount to the same thing. You can use the binomial expansion for a fractional exponent:

(1+x)^\alpha = 1 + \alpha x + \frac{\alpha (\alpha -1)}{1 \cdot 2} x^2 + \frac{\alpha (\alpha -1)(\alpha - 2)}{1 \cdot 2\cdot 3} x^3 + ...

If \alpha is fractional, then the series never terminates, but that doesn't matter.

But that's the same series you would get if you took derivatives:

Letting G(x) = (1+x)^\alpha,

G'(x) = \alpha (1+x)^{\alpha - 1}
G''(x) = \alpha (\alpha - 1) (1+x)^{\alpha - 2}
G'''(x) = \alpha(\alpha - 1)(\alpha - 2) (1+x)^{\alpha - 3}
...

So you can write: G(x) = G(0) + x G'(0) + \frac{x^2}{1 \cdot 2} G''(0) + \frac{x^3}{1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3} G'''(0) + ...

You get the same series.

For this problem, if you're going to use binomial expansions, you have to compute the case \alpha = +\frac{1}{2} for \sqrt{1+x} and compute the case \alpha = -\frac{1}{2} for \sqrt{1-x} (using -x) and then you have to multiply the two series, and group the terms by powers of x.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor and Amara
  • #10
Thank you, this is clear now and has helped a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K