Calculating Vertical +Horizontal Forces of Beam in Equilib.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating vertical and horizontal reactions at supports for two beams, A and B, using LinPro software. For Beam A, the calculated reactions are Ha = -12kN, Va = -39.46kN, and Vb = 36.54kN, but discrepancies arise in the calculations. The participant initially misapplied equilibrium equations, particularly in accounting for moments and the effects of angled supports. The correct approach involves recognizing the 2-D frame structure and applying the correct angles for forces acting on the supports.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles, including ∑Ma = 0, ∑Hf = 0, and ∑Vf = 0.
  • Familiarity with LinPro software for structural analysis.
  • Knowledge of beam support types, including roller and pinned supports.
  • Ability to analyze forces and moments in 2-D frames.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of equilibrium equations in 2-D frame analysis.
  • Learn how to correctly apply angles for forces acting on supports, especially in non-vertical orientations.
  • Explore advanced features of LinPro for accurate structural analysis.
  • Review case studies involving complex beam systems and their reactions under load.
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in analyzing beam reactions and equilibrium in structural frameworks.

King_Silver
Messages
83
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks
 

Attachments

  • wtututu.png
    wtututu.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 565
Physics news on Phys.org
King_Silver said:

Homework Statement


Below are attached 2 beams, A and B. I have to calculate the vertical and horizontal reactions at both supports in both questions. I have done a lot of calculations and believe I have a good understanding of what is needed to be done however my forces are not balancing for some reason. We use a software called LinPro and for Beam A the following answers are given: Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN

Homework Equations


∑Ma = 0
∑Hf = 0
∑Vf = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



For A I have set it up as follows.
Va + Vb = 60kN + 16kN (76kN)
The 16kN comes from 4kN* 4 from the diagonal force given.
I then took the moments about point A as follows.
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
5Vb = 202kN
Vb = 40.4kN which is NOT 36.54kN.

You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
The horizontal forces are easy to calculate due to Vb being a roller support therefore Hb = 0 which ultimately means Ha = -12kN.

For the Support B!
Va+Vb = 50kN
Ha+Hb = 10kN (once again, Ha = -10kN because of the roller support at Hb = 0kN)

For this one however the support is at an angle. How to deal with supports at an angle? I figured it would just be Arctan(1/2) but that s giving me some strange answers which I know from just looking at aren't quite right.

Am I missing something crucial? I feel I must be overlooking something or are the answers I am calculating on Linpro software just incorrect and am I the one who is right? thanks

For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.
 
SteamKing said:
You must account for the direction of the individual moments. About point A, the 20 kN dist. load will have a CW rotation as will the 16 kN component force at the end. The reaction Vb will have a CCW rotation.
For the support on a slope, you must use the correct angle which is normal to the ground. Arctan (1/2) is not the correct angle normal to the ground.

So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
 
King_Silver said:
So you're saying instead of (20kN*3m*1.5m) + 5Vb + (16kN*7) = 0
(20kN*3m*1.5m) + (16kN*7) = 5Vb
How would that change my values though? or am I misunderstanding? Also, are the answers Ha = -12kN , Va = -39.46kN, Vb = 36.54kN correct for Beam A?

Normal to the ground.. a flat surface is 180 degrees. The support is at a diagonal so it will have both a Hf and Vf component no?
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: King_Silver
SteamKing said:
I thought you had two separate beams. What you have is a 2-D frame. View A represents a longitudinal elevation of this frame, while view B is looking from say the 2m vertical bar toward the other end. The tiny circle at the end of the 20 kN/m dist. load shows where this 5 m horizontal side beam connects to the 7 m long beam.

Since this 5 m side beam is loaded, your equilibrium equations are affected, which is why your initial calculations weren't working out.

Got it sorted! I forgot about the pin and realized where I was going wrong cheers for that!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K