Calculating Wasted Energy: The Efficiency of Force Applied at an Angle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bobie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating wasted energy when pulling a weight at an angle, specifically 45°. The work done on the object is expressed as $E_{45} = K J$, while the distance covered when pulling along the track is $D_0 = K/cos45°$, resulting in an energy output of $E_0 = 1.41 * K$. It concludes that approximately 41% of energy is wasted when force is applied at an angle, as the efficiency of human exertion can range from 18% to 26%. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding mechanical work definitions and the inefficiencies in energy expenditure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical work and energy definitions
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry, particularly cosine functions
  • Familiarity with energy efficiency concepts in biomechanics
  • Ability to interpret and analyze force measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Mechanical Work and Energy Calculations" for deeper insights
  • Explore "Biomechanics of Human Motion" to understand energy expenditure
  • Learn about "Trigonometric Functions in Physics" for practical applications
  • Investigate "Efficiency of Muscle Work" to compare human and mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, biomechanics researchers, fitness professionals, and anyone interested in optimizing energy efficiency in physical activities.

bobie
Gold Member
Messages
720
Reaction score
2
Edit: Suppose you are pulling a weight along a track at an angle (in the picture 45°).
horse pulling a cart on a track

If the object is dislocated by a distance D let's assume that the work done/energy tranmitted to the object is $E_{45}$ = K J. If you had pulled along the track, would the distance covered by the object be $D_0$ = K/cos45° and $E_0$ = K/cos45 = 1.41 * K? if this is correct, can we conclude that the energy wasted/ calories burned doing no mechanical work is 41 %?.

(If this is not correct, how can we calculate the energy wasted when we apply a force at an angle greater than 0°?)

I know that no mechanical work in excess is done, that is because of the peculiarity of the definition of work. I tried to dodge this ostacle speaking of *calories burned*: I thought we can desume that by reverse engineering.

The logic is this: we have instruments (I am referring to instruments, so we avoid inefficiency of human muscles) to produce and measure force. If we measure the force something exerts on a blocked object, then remove the block and measure the oucome of that force, can't we deduce that the same force has been applied before and the **same amount of energy/calories has been wasted?**
If this logic is valid, the same logic has been applied to the horse.

A biologist can tell us the percentage of calories burned in excess of the effective force applied/ transmitted, the inefficiency of the human machine is around 80%: you burn 4 - 5 times more energy than you put to avail. Efficiency may vary from 18% to 26%. In the case above energy actually burned would be 41*4.5 = ca. 185%
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Weight is proportional to mass, which doesn't directly determines the force you are pushing object with. The fact that you pushed object weighing 100N (cc 11kg) for 1 meter doesn't mean that work done is 100 j.
 
I assume the track is an incline, and it rises vertically a distance of 1 meter, so that the distance you push the weight up the incline is 1.41 meters. But the force you need to exert to push the weight up the incline is only 70.7 N. So the work is still 100 joules.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K