I Calculating Watt Hours for a time interval less than 1 second

Click For Summary
Using an online physics calculator can yield confusing results, especially when inputting time values less than one second for watt-hour calculations. The initial error message regarding negative values is misleading, as the calculator ultimately provides a result. The discussion highlights uncertainty about the unit "J watts hours" and the accuracy of the output, specifically the value of 0.1. A proper calculation shows that multiplying power (10W) by time (0.01s) and converting from joules to watt-hours results in approximately 27.8 micro watt-hours. Understanding the conversion process is crucial for accurate energy calculations.
pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Is it OK to put less than 1 second into the equation ?
I use an online physics calculator a lot to help me for various reasons. When I input less than 1 second into a watt hour calculation it initially tells me it can not be a negative value although that does disappear and it does do the calculation.

Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241111_232524_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241111_232524_Chrome.jpg
    20.3 KB · Views: 77
  • Screenshot_20241111_232347_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241111_232347_Chrome.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 53
Physics news on Phys.org
pete94857 said:
Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and pete94857
berkeman said:
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
It is an ambiguous interface. The answer is in joules.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes pete94857 and berkeman
pete94857 said:
TL;DR Summary: Is it OK to put less than 1 second into the equation ?

I use an online physics calculator a lot to help me for various reasons. When I input less than 1 second into a watt hour calculation it initially tells me it can not be a negative value although that does disappear and it does do the calculation.

Example power 10 w time 0.01 seconds 0.1 J watts hours.
It doesn’t like zero, but greatery than zero seems ok. Watt-hours should be Energy.
 
berkeman said:
I have no idea what a "J watts hours" is as a unit, and the number 0.1 looks incorrect to me.

Can you show us by hand how you would calculate 10W*0.01s with the results in Watt*Hours?
Power x time = Energy. Power is the required energy to power something, time is the amount of time needed and energy is the energy needed to perform the task at that time. Or reverse E/t=w
 
pete94857 said:
Power x time = Energy. Power is the required energy to power something, time is the amount of time needed and energy is the energy needed to perform the task at that time. Or reverse E/t=w
Well, that didn't really answer my question, but I'll show you how to do it since I don't think this is a schoolwork-related question.

So to calculate the Energy based on power and time and convert units from W*s to W*hr:

$$E = 10W ~0.01s ~ \frac{1hr}{3600s} = 27.8\mu Whr $$

Note how I converted from W*s (Joules) to W*hr by multiplying by "1" in this form: ##1=\frac{1hr}{3600s}## to get the right cancellations of units from the initial answer to what I wanted. :wink:
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
525
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K