Understanding Watt vs. Kilowatt-Hour: A Comprehensive Explanation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kuin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Watt
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the distinction between watts and watt-hours, emphasizing that watts measure power (the rate of doing work) while watt-hours measure energy (the total work done over time). A person climbing a ladder at a rate of 600 watts exemplifies power, while a 100W light bulb running for one hour consumes 0.1 kilowatt-hours of energy. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and units involved, as confusion often arises from the interchangeable use of terms in common language.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly work, power, and energy.
  • Familiarity with units of measurement such as watts, joules, and kilowatt-hours.
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculating power and energy.
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its implications in energy calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between power, energy, and time in physics.
  • Learn about the conversion between different energy units, such as joules and kilowatt-hours.
  • Explore practical applications of power and energy calculations in household energy consumption.
  • Investigate the implications of energy storage and production in renewable energy systems.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students, educators, and professionals in physics, engineering, and energy management, as well as anyone interested in understanding energy consumption in everyday life.

  • #31
I'm pretty sure the remark was just a comment on the fact that people lack intuition for visualizing energy quantities in real-life situations. We've seen time and time again the exact problem discussed above: that people are very surprised at just how little energy there is in lifting a weight vs doing other kinds of electrical work such as producing light or heat.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes I agree. I made the same point as you, a few posts back, that it's hard to reconcile the two energy forms. The only way to deal with these counter-intuitive things is to do some actual sums and get an answer that can reassure you. There is loads of "accurate data" available.

One useful comparison is between doing light work outside in warm weather and doing the same work out in sub zero conditions. You need an awful lot more food to keep going in the cold. This link could be a way into this subject. It is very complex.
 
  • #33
hi,

I just can't understand that remark at all

I may have used a bad formulation for my remark.

I'm pretty sure the remark was just a comment on the fact that people lack intuition for visualizing energy quantities in real-life situations.

yes. What I exactly meant is, say, lifting 1 kg up 1 meter and feel what it 'means' is easy, even for someone with zero science inclination. This is my real accurate data, 1 kg and 1 meter.

For heat, it's already a little more difficult to grasp. I think, I might be wrong, that for most people, it is difficult to have a clear image of a 1 degree rise in temperature, more so for the electrical energy needed to produce it.

The idea is to get super easy understandable examples that will trigger interest where there was none.

my problem now, I realize, is that even with kgs and meters, when you deal with such large numbers, it becomes intangible again, it's impossible to represent those amounts. I will have to change scales first I guess, start with the 100W light bulb.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K