hi,
I just can't understand that remark at all
I may have used a bad formulation for my remark.
I'm pretty sure the remark was just a comment on the fact that people lack intuition for visualizing energy quantities in real-life situations.
yes. What I exactly meant is, say, lifting 1 kg up 1 meter and feel what it 'means' is easy, even for someone with zero science inclination. This is my real accurate data, 1 kg and 1 meter.
For heat, it's already a little more difficult to grasp. I think, I might be wrong, that for most people, it is difficult to have a clear image of a 1 degree rise in temperature, more so for the electrical energy needed to produce it.
The idea is to get super easy understandable examples that will trigger interest where there was none.
my problem now, I realize, is that even with kgs and meters, when you deal with such large numbers, it becomes intangible again, it's impossible to represent those amounts. I will have to change scales first I guess, start with the 100W light bulb.
Thanks again.