Calculating Work and Potential for Moving Charges in an Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter indigojoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work and potential associated with moving a charge in the electric field created by two stationary charges. The original poster presents a scenario involving charges located at specific positions and questions the work required to move a third charge from infinity to a designated point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric potential and work, with some questioning the necessity of including the charge being moved in the calculations. Others discuss the implications of integrating electric fields and potential energy formulas, while also examining the effects of discontinuities in the integrals.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the mathematical expressions and integrals involved in calculating work and potential. Some participants offer guidance on the correct approach, while others express confusion over the results and the assumptions being made. Multiple interpretations of the integrals and their implications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the integrals, particularly around points of discontinuity and the direction of electric fields. There is also a discussion about the energy of charges at different positions and the implications of moving charges in an electric field.

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Suppose there was a charge +Q located at x=-a and a +Q charge at x=a. If i wanted to bring in a charge of -Q form infinity to x=0, what is the work that I have to do?

just wondering if i have the right expression:
[tex]V=-\int _{\inf} ^a \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o } \frac{Q}{r^2}dr + -\int_{\inf}^{-a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr[/tex]

if i wanted to move the charge at the origin to x=+2a, the work i would have to do:

[tex]V=-\int _{a} ^{3a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o } \frac{Q}{r^2}dr + -\int_{-a}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr[/tex]

I was also wondering where the charge of the charge I'm moving comes into play, it doesn't seem like it matters for these equations?

also, why is calculating the potential the same as finding the work?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, those look right to me. But that gives the potential difference between infinity and that point... to get the work... you need to multiply the result by -Q.
 
But have you studied potential and energy due to point charges?

You can write the result immediately without integrals...
 
how do you do that?
 
indigojoker said:
how do you do that?

The energy of the charge at infinity is 0...

The energy of the charge at x = 0, is just:

[tex]\frac{kQ(-Q)}{a} + \frac{kQ(-Q)}{a} = \frac{-2kQ^2}{a}[/tex]

I'm using the formula... electric potential energy between two point charges is:

[tex]\frac{kq_1q_2}{r}[/tex]

So the change in energy is negative. So the charge loses energy... ie: you do negative work on the object...
 
Last edited:
something weird happened and I'm not sure if it's supposed to:
[tex]V=-\int _{\inf} ^a \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o } \frac{Q}{r^2}dr + -\int_{\inf}^{-a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr =0[/tex]

I get:

[tex]V=-\frac{kQ}{a} + \frac{kQ}{a} =0[/tex]

so it takes no work to move the charge there?
 
indigojoker said:
something weird happened and I'm not sure if it's supposed to:
[tex]V=-\int _{\inf} ^a \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o } \frac{Q}{r^2}dr + -\int_{\inf}^{-a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr =0[/tex]

I get:

[tex]V=-\frac{kQ}{a} + \frac{kQ}{a} =0[/tex]

so it takes no work to move the charge there?

No... you have to be careful about the integrals... if you are integrating along the x-axis...

let's examine the charge at x = a, and the voltage due to that charge. (here r = x - a, where x is the coordinate of the charge being brought in... a is the coordinate of the stationary charge)

[tex]-\int_{\inf}^{-a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}[/tex]

this equals:

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr} + \int_{a}^{0} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}+\int_{0}^{-a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr})[/tex]

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr +\int_{a}^{0} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr +\int_{0}^{-a} \frac{-1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr)[/tex]

see, the last section of that integral... the field is in the opposite direction, so a minus needs to be put in... also the a to 0... and 0 to -a parts cancel each other out... so we end up with the same integral as with the other stationary charge...

I think maybe this integral is problematic because there's a discontinuity when r = 0... but it works out anyway.
 
learningphysics said:
The energy of the charge at infinity is 0...

The energy of the charge at x = 0, is just:

[tex]\frac{kQ(-Q)}{a} + \frac{kQ(-Q)}{a} = \frac{-2kQ^2}{a}[/tex]

I'm using the formula... electric potential energy between two point charges is:

[tex]\frac{kq_1q_2}{r}[/tex]

So the change in energy is negative. So the charge loses energy... ie: you do negative work on the object...

so the potential at x=-a is the same as the potential at x=a?
 
Last edited:
learningphysics said:
No... you have to be careful about the integrals... if you are integrating along the x-axis...

let's examine the charge at x = a, and the voltage due to that charge. (here r = x - a, where x is the coordinate of the charge being brought in... a is the coordinate of the stationary charge)

[tex]-\int_{\inf}^{-a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}[/tex]

this equals:

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr} + \int_{a}^{0} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}+\int_{0}^{-a} \vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr})[/tex]

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr +\int_{a}^{0} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr +\int_{0}^{-a} \frac{-1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr)[/tex]

see, the last section of that integral... the field is in the opposite direction, so a minus needs to be put in... also the a to 0... and 0 to -a parts cancel each other out... so we end up with the same integral as with the other stationary charge...

I think maybe this integral is problematic because there's a discontinuity when r = 0... but it works out anyway.

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr -\int_{a}^{-a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr)[/tex]
[tex]=-(kQ (-1/a)-kq(2/a))= kQ 3/a[/tex]

maybe I'm just doing the integrals wrong
 
  • #10
indigojoker said:
[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr -\int_{a}^{-a} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr)[/tex]
[tex]=-(kQ (-1/a)-kq(2/a))= kQ 3/a[/tex]

maybe I'm just doing the integrals wrong

The integral from a to 0 has kQ/r^2 inside the integral, but the integral from 0 to -a should have -kQ/r^2 (with the minus sign) inside the integral... the direction of the field has changed from rightward to leftward.

So you can't put it all under the same integral...
 
  • #11
why couldn't i do this:

[tex]-(\int_{\inf}^{0} \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr +\int_{0}^{-a} \frac{-1}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{Q}{r^2}dr)[/tex]

since the field from infinity to zero is the same?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K