Calculating Work by Tension on Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yae Miteo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension Work
Yae Miteo
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass m_1 = 4.1 kg rests on a frictionless table and connected by a massless pulley to another mass m_2 = 3 kg, which hangs freely from the string. When released, the hanging mass falls a distance d=0.83m.

How much work is done by tension on m_1?

Homework Equations



[tex]v^2 = v_0^2 + 2a(x-x_0)[/tex]

[tex]w=Fx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I began with w=Fx. I re-wrote it as

[tex]w=max[/tex]

because F=ma.

But from here I'm stuck. I can't find acceleration, and I'm pretty sure it has something to do with gravity, but not completely. I feel that I'm pretty close but I just can't get that last part.
 
on Phys.org
Hi Yae Mieteo.
Draw the free body diagrams of m1 and m2 and set up equations using 2nd law.
Can you find tension in the string?
 
After doing that, I get this.

[tex]F=ma[/tex]
so
[tex]T=m_2g[/tex]
to get a, I solve F=ma to get a=F/m (and m is m_1 + m_2), and then plugin into
[tex]W = Fd[/tex]
I get
[tex]W=mad[/tex]
so
[tex]W= \frac{(m_2)(T)(d)}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]
and plugging in I get
[tex]W=10.3177[/tex]
which is wrong. I think I'm even closer, but there is an error somewhere, maybe wrong masses?
 
Yae Miteo said:
so
[tex]T=m_2g[/tex]
If that were true then the net force on ##m_2## would be zero and it would not accelerate.
 
Would tension then be
[tex]T=m_1g[/tex]
or would it involve both mass 1 and mass 2?
 
Yae Miteo said:
Would tension then be
[tex]T=m_1g[/tex]
or would it involve both mass 1 and mass 2?
It seems like you're just guessing. Instead, set up two equations--one for each mass--and solve for the tension. (Yes, it will involve both masses.)
 
So, solving for tension, I get

[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1-m_2}[/tex]

and then putting it into[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

I get

[tex]W=\cfrac{m_2m_2gd}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]

Is this correct?
 
P4.png
Can you set up equations using 2nd law for M1 and M2?
 
Yae Miteo said:
So, solving for tension, I get

[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1-m_2}[/tex]

and then putting it into[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

I get

[tex]W=\cfrac{m_2m_2gd}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]

Is this correct?
Yes, that looks good. (Except for the minus sign in your expression for tension. A typo?)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Yae Miteo said:
So, solving for tension, I get

[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1-m_2}[/tex]
How you got minus sign in denominator?
I think this is typo.
Yae Miteo said:
and then putting it into[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

I get

[tex]W=\cfrac{m_2m_2gd}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]

Is this correct?
I think this is correct.
 
  • #11
Yae Miteo said:
So, solving for tension, I get

[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1-m_2}[/tex]
I missed that minus sign. I assumed it was a typo. Was it?
 
  • #12
yes, it was a typo
 
  • #13
And the 2nd law equations for tension are

[tex]F_1=m_1a[/tex]

[tex]F_2=m_2g[/tex]

right?
 
  • #14
What is F1 and F2?
 
  • #15
Yae Miteo said:
And the 2nd law equations for tension are

[tex]F_1=m_1a[/tex]

[tex]F_2=m_2g[/tex]

right?
No. All second law equations should be in the form of ##\Sigma F = ma##.

How did you solve for the tension before? Not this way.
 
  • #16
I worked it like this:

tension will equal the sum of both forces, so
[tex]m_2a + m_2g = T[/tex]
and
[tex]T = m_1a[/tex]
solve for a
[tex]a = \cfrac{m_2g}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]
plug in
[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]
 
  • #17
Yae Miteo said:
I worked it like this:

tension will equal the sum of both forces, so
[tex]m_2a + m_2g = T[/tex]
and
[tex]T = m_1a[/tex]
solve for a
[tex]a = \cfrac{m_2g}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]
plug in
[tex]T = \cfrac{m_1m_2g}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]
That looks right.
 
  • #18
So then into
[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

[tex]W=\cfrac{m_1m_2gd}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]
 
  • #19
Yae Miteo said:
So then into
[tex]W=Fd[/tex]

[tex]W=\cfrac{m_1m_2gd}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]
This is correct.:)
 
  • #20
Yae Miteo said:
I worked it like this:

tension will equal the sum of both forces, so
[tex]m_2a + m_2g = T[/tex]
and
[tex]T = m_1a[/tex]
You have a sign error. Note that if you actually solved these equations as written, you'd get a minus sign instead of a plus sign in the denominator of your expressions for a and T.
 
  • #21
Thank-you so much guys! I got it figured out.
 
  • #22
Doc Al said:
You have a sign error. Note that if you actually solved these equations as written, you'd get a minus sign instead of a plus sign in the denominator of your expressions for a and T.
Yes, there should be negative sign.
 
  • #23
Yae Miteo said:
Thank-you so much guys! I got it figured out.
You are welcome.:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K