Calculating Work on a Box Moving up a Ramp: Physics Problem Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done on a box moving up a frictionless ramp under the influence of a constant force. The box has a mass of 3.00 kg, and a force of 82.0 N is applied at an angle of 53.0°. The vertical distance the box moves is given as 0.150 m. Participants are exploring the relationship between work, energy, and the forces acting on the box.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest using the work-energy principle and conservation of energy to analyze the problem. Others express confusion regarding the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and the work done by the applied force, particularly in the context of constant speed and net work.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the relationship between work done by different forces and the energy changes involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of constant speed and the need to consider potential energy, but there is still uncertainty about the correct application of concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of clarity in the textbook regarding the treatment of work and energy, particularly as the participants have not yet covered potential energy in their coursework. This may contribute to the confusion surrounding the problem.

Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


n Figure 7-32, a constant force of magnitude 82.0 N is applied to a 3.00 kg shoe box at angle f = 53.0°, causing the box to move up a frictionless ramp at constant speed. How much work is done on the box by when the box has moved through vertical distance h = 0.150 m??


Homework Equations


see link for picture of figure... http://www.lowellphysics.org/beta/T...rk/Problems/c07x7_11.xform_files/nw0314-n.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


I think I should be using W=fdcos(theta)...but since the displacement given is vertical instead of horizontal, i don't think i could use h=.150m without manipulating the problem more. but i am also confused because they do not give the angle of the incline, so i cannot figure out what the angle between the force and displacement is. Perhaps I am just missing a simple geometry relationship, but I cannot figure out what. Please help! This problem is really bothering me because it doesn't seem to be a difficult one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Puchinita5 said:

Homework Statement


n Figure 7-32, a constant force of magnitude 82.0 N is applied to a 3.00 kg shoe box at angle f = 53.0°, causing the box to move up a frictionless ramp at constant speed. How much work is done on the box by when the box has moved through vertical distance h = 0.150 m??

Homework Equations


see link for picture of figure... http://www.lowellphysics.org/beta/T...rk/Problems/c07x7_11.xform_files/nw0314-n.gif

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I should be using W=fdcos(theta)...but since the displacement given is vertical instead of horizontal, i don't think i could use h=.150m without manipulating the problem more. but i am also confused because they do not give the angle of the incline, so i cannot figure out what the angle between the force and displacement is. Perhaps I am just missing a simple geometry relationship, but I cannot figure out what. Please help! This problem is really bothering me because it doesn't seem to be a difficult one.

Welcome to PF.

Have you covered the relationship with potential energy and work in your coursework?
 
Assuming the question is asking for the wotk done by the applied force, consider using the conservation of total energy equation. Or note that since thr block is moving at constant speed, the work-energy principle for total work done by all forces should also help.
 
ok now I'm having a sort of concept problem...i got the right answer but I'm not sure why it works...

i put the Kinetic energy equal to Potential energy...so .5mv^2=mgh and then solved for v, which i then plugged back into .5mv^s to get work... this gave me the correct answer...but why does this give me the work due to applied force when this doesn't account for work due to gravity?

not sure if this question makes sense...
 
hmmm , as in, wouldn't this answer be total work?
 
We apply a constant force, yet it's moving at constant speed...get the hint yet?
 
okay...i see what u are saying in that a constant force implies that the velocity shouldn't be constant...but it is...soooooo that means, i don't know? I am really starting to feel like an idiot now, it is flying right over my head... :-/

i still don't get why the net work is equal to the work due to the applied force...
 
Are you sure net work is equal to work done by applied force *only*?

Constant force implies constant acceleration, yet we have constant speed! Constant speed implies no net force, therefore...?

Hint: draw a free body diagram (as you always should when doing such problems)
 
ehhhh okay, trying not to be really irritating by the fact that i totally am confused...but okay, so my book asked for work done by applied force, when i solved for .5mv^2, the answer i got was the correct answer...but change in KE should be net work...so I'm confused on what happened to gravitational work...which i wouldn't be confused it gravitational work equaled zero, but that should only be so if it was 90 degrees from the displacement, which it is not...

i'm trying to figure out what u are hinting at...does it have to do with that the displacement is in the y direction and that in the y direction there is zero net force?...
 
  • #10
Why are you only trying to solve for KE? Does the object not move up the ramp? It will then gain PE, right? And you were trying to find change in KE? Is there actually a change in KE?

In both posts I emphasized *constant speed* so there is NO change in KE. I'm trying to hint to you that since there is no net force, there is no work being done to change KE. Thus only PE changes, and using PE = mgh to find the answer is trivial.

What you did is to somehow say KE = PE (which is incorrect), and then plugging it backwards to get the work done (which is actually the reversal of your first step), then get confused because you didn't realize all you had to do was to find PE. That's all there is to this question.
 
  • #11
oh dear, thanks so much! it just all clicked, i totally got stuck and my brain just kept going around in circles...so yea, net work=change in KE...so W(gravity)+W(applied force)=0...so then W(Gravity)=mgd costheta...which equals -4.41 so then W(applied force)=4.41 j...it all makes sense thanks for helping!
 
  • #12
Why are you still insisiting net work = change in KE? There is PE too!@.@ If this is something you have memorized from somewhere, forget it now! It's not always the case!

Net work = change in energy ==> correct
 
  • #13
it is what my textbook and my lecture notes say
 
  • #14
perhaps it is because we have not gotten to potential energy yet in the book, it is the next chapter...maybe that is where the confusion is!
 
  • #15
yea i just skimmed forward to see what the formulas for the next chapter looked like...and it does say that work=change in energy...they should have been more clear that the forumlas they use are shortened based on whatever the chapter is on...kind of misleading and confusing! thanks for pointing it out...
 
  • #16
Nvm edit
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
22K
Replies
3
Views
2K