Calculating Work on a Stretched Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrutij
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the work done on a spring that follows the restoring force equation F = -kx + βx³, with k = 8.7 N/m and β = 95 N/m³. The user attempted to calculate the force at a stretch of 0.105 m, resulting in F = -1.02 N, and subsequently calculated work using W = F * d, yielding an incorrect result of -0.107 J. The consensus is that the problem lacks critical information regarding the proportional limit stretch distance, necessary for correctly applying the force equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its limitations
  • Familiarity with cubic force equations in physics
  • Basic knowledge of work-energy principles
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and unit conversions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of proportional limits in spring mechanics
  • Study the derivation and application of the cubic force equation F = -kx + βx³
  • Learn how to calculate work done on non-linear springs
  • Explore examples of restoring forces in different materials and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to spring dynamics and work calculations.

shrutij
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When a certain spring is stretched beyond its proportional limit, the restoring force satisfies the equation F=-kx+βx3. If k=8.7 N/m and β=95 N/m3, calculate the work done by this force when the spring is stretched 0.105 m.


Homework Equations


W= F*d


The Attempt at a Solution


I found F by plugging in the values of k, β and x=0.105 m to get -1.02. The negative for the force value makes sense here since it is a restoring force acting in the negative direction. Am i wrong in this reasoning?
My answer is wrong, though since when I try W=F*d; =-1.02*.105, I get -0.107 J, which is wrong. Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert on this, but surely the formula is F = -kx for x between 0 and the proportional limit, then the more complex formula beyond that.
And you can't do the problem without knowing the stretch distance of the proportional limit so you know where to switch formulas.
 
Delphi51 said:
I am not an expert on this, but surely the formula is F = -kx for x between 0 and the proportional limit, then the more complex formula beyond that.
And you can't do the problem without knowing the stretch distance of the proportional limit so you know where to switch formulas.
That sounds logical to me. The problem is missing one vital piece of information.

shrutij, what is the given correct answer?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K