Calculation of the Berry connection for a 2x2 Hamiltonian

Silicon-Based
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the Berry connection
Relevant Equations
$$
A_R = i\langle \psi | \nabla_R| \psi \rangle
$$
This isn't technically a homework problem, but I'm trying to check my understanding of the geometric phase by explicitly calculating the Berry connection for a simple 2x2 Hamiltonian that is not a textbook example of a spin-1/2 particle in a three dimensional magnetic field solved via a Bloch sphere representation and my results don't make sense. Suppose I have the Hamiltonian
$$
H = a\sigma_x+c\sigma_z =
\begin{pmatrix}
c & a\\
a & -c
\end{pmatrix}
$$ To simplify the calculations slightly I switch to polar coordinates using $$a=r\cos(\theta)$$ and $$c=r\sin(\theta).$$ The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian are
$$
E_{\pm}=\pm r
$$ and the eigenvector associated with the negative eigenvalue becomes
$$
|-\rangle = (r^2-2r\sin(\theta)+1)^{-1/2} (\sin(\theta)-r,\cos(\theta))^T
$$ It is evident from the expression for the above eigenvector that the Berry connection for this eigenstate, which for the $r$-component is defined as
$$
A_r = i\langle - | \frac{\partial}{\partial r} |- \rangle,
$$ will be purely imaginary. This is obviously wrong as the Berry phase, which is the integral over the Berry connection, must be real, but I'm confused as to why my calculations are incorrect. In the textbook examples of a spin-1/2 particle, there is a convenient phase factor of $e^{i\phi}$ present in the eigenstates, which results in a real value for the $\phi$-component of the Berry connection upon differentiation, unlike in the example above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silicon-Based said:
Suppose I have the Hamiltonian
$$
H = a\sigma_x+c\sigma_z =
\begin{pmatrix}
c & a\\
a & -c
\end{pmatrix}
$$ To simplify the calculations slightly I switch to polar coordinates using $$a=r\cos(\theta)$$ and $$c=r\sin(\theta).$$ The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian are
$$
E_{\pm}=\pm r
$$ and the eigenvector associated with the negative eigenvalue becomes
$$
|-\rangle = (r^2-2r\sin(\theta)+1)^{-1/2} (\sin(\theta)-r,\cos(\theta))^T
$$
Your expression for ##|-\rangle## doesn't look correct to me. Note that the Hamiltonian can be written as
$$
H = r
\begin{pmatrix}
\sin(\theta) & \cos(\theta)\\
\cos(\theta) & -\sin(\theta)
\end{pmatrix}$$
##r## appears as an overall multiplicative factor. So, the eigenvectors should not depend on ##r##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top