Can mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X? Find Out!

  • Thread starter Thread starter A13235378
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 / X is under discussion, focusing on the implications of gravitational interactions and the concept of reduced mass (μ) in a two-body problem. Participants emphasize the need to clarify the minimum distance between the two masses and the significance of ignoring gravitational attraction. The consensus is that while the reduced mass can be determined, the individual masses of the two particles cannot be identified without additional information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and the two-body problem
  • Familiarity with the concept of reduced mass (μ)
  • Knowledge of gravitational interactions and their implications
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical equations involving kinetic and potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of reduced mass in physics
  • Study the principles of central force motion in two-body problems
  • Explore simulations of gravitational interactions using tools like Excel
  • Examine the role of potential energy in systems involving electric charges
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly those studying gravitational interactions and two-body problems.

A13235378
Messages
50
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Two identical particles with velocities u and v, which form angles α and β with the straight line that joins them, are at a distance l from each other. The charge of each particle is q. Determine the mass of the particles, knowing that the minimum distance between the two is X. Despise the gravitational interaction.
Relevant Equations
mv^2 /2
kq^2 /d
1596743358220.png
I can only say that:

mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X

Yes or not and why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever translation software you are using isn't very good. "knowing that the minimum distance between the two is worth" sounds like a critical part of the problem, and I have no idea what that means. As for "Despise the gravitational interaction", I already do. :wink: We can't help you if we don't understand you.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Whatever translation software you are using isn't very good. "knowing that the minimum distance between the two is worth" sounds like a critical part of the problem, and I have no idea what that means. As for "Despise the gravitational interaction", I already do. :wink: We can't help you if we don't understand you.

Sorry , I am spanish , my english is not very good. I already correct.
 
A13235378 said:
Sorry , I am spanish , my english is not very good. I already correct.
And "Despise the gravitational interaction" means to ignore the gravitational attraction between the masses, right?

(I also edited your thread title for you to make it a bit clearer) :smile:
 
berkeman said:
And "Despise the gravitational interaction" means to ignore the gravitational attraction between the masses, right?

(I also edited your thread title for you to make it a bit clearer) :smile:
yeah
 
Are you familiar with reducing a two-body problem with a central force to a one-body problem with a reduced mass ##\mu##? For example, see this .

It seems to me that you will be able to find only the reduced mass. You won't be able to find the individual masses of the two particles.
 
A13235378 said:
mv^2 /2 + mu^2 / 2 + kq^2 / L = kq^2 /X
That would be true if they were stationary at closest approach. Will that be so?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
TSny said:
It seems to me that you will be able to find only the reduced mass. You won't be able to find the individual masses of the two particles.
It says they are identical...
 
Maybe we should wait for a problem attempt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe we should wait for a problem attempt.

But I was about to post my Excel simulation as a cross-check for the OP to check their work. Oh, wait... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K