Calculations in developing an Electrostatic Series

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab experiment involving the interaction of hard and soft materials with a negatively charged comb to determine charge polarity and strength. The user recorded qualitative measurements of attraction and repulsion, noting discrepancies when a second comb was used as a hard object. They seek advice on improving their calculations for electronegativity and inquire about potential differences in observations if a metal fork or spoon replaced the comb. Additionally, there is a request for assistance from peers who have conducted the same experiment, indicating a collaborative effort in understanding the lab. Overall, the conversation highlights challenges in interpreting experimental results and the need for clarification on the effects of different materials in electrostatic interactions.
User1247
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lab: rub each of a set of hard materials against a set of soft materials. Hold the hard materials near a suspended, negatively charged comb (wool rubbed) to determine the charge polarity and strength on the hard item. Create a list of the hard and soft items used in order of electronegativity.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I qualitatively measured the attraction or repulsion between the charged items and the negatively charged comb with a rating from 0-20 in strength, this is recorded in a table.
Note that only the hard objects were held near the suspended comb and tested, in the Table 2.0 the soft objects have the attraction and repulsion amounts found in their sums from Table 1.0 switched because this is what they would have shown if held to the comb, since they gave or took the charge from the hard items.

The problem: One hard object, a second comb, used as one of the hard objects, attracts the comb when rubbed by some soft items and repels the comb when rubbed by other soft items. I reconciled this by taking the difference between the amount of attraction and repulsion between the comb and that object. Is there a better way I can do this calculation to determine the electronegativity?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • L9 P6 Lab Tables.JPG
    L9 P6 Lab Tables.JPG
    62.5 KB · Views: 914
Physics news on Phys.org
im having probelms with answering the question: if you were to replace the suspened comb with a metal fork or spoon do you think your observations would be different? explain why or why not?

someone please help me that doing the same thing. iv already don't this experiment and some help would be helpful
 
I am doing the same lab. Are you doing an independent study course as well? How is the marker? is he tough?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K