Calculus - behaviour of functions - first derivative and the likes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the polynomial function P(x) = x4 + ax3 + bx2 + cx + d, specifically regarding its first derivative P'(x) = 4x3 + 3ax2 + 2bx + c. It is established that P'(x) has a single real root at x = 0, indicating that P(x) is upward concave. Given the condition P(–1) < P(1), it is concluded that P(–1) cannot be a minimum in the interval [–1, 1], while P(1) is confirmed as the maximum. The final answer to the posed question is option (1).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their derivatives
  • Knowledge of critical points and their significance in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concepts of maxima and minima
  • Basic graphing skills for polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the first derivative test in calculus
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of polynomial functions
  • Learn about the behavior of cubic polynomials and their derivatives
  • Investigate the relationship between critical points and local extrema
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in the analysis of polynomial functions and their graphical behavior.

dharavsolanki
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given P(x) = x4 + ax3 + bx2 + cx + d such that x = 0 is the only real root of P'(x) = 0. If P(–1) < P(1), then in the interval [–1, 1]

(1) P(–1) is not minimum but P(1) is the maximum of P
(2) P(–1) is minimum but P(1) is not the maximum of P
(3) Neither P(–1) is the minimum nor P(1) is the maximum of P
(4) P(–1) is the minimum and P(1) is the maximum of P


Homework Equations



The answer is 1.

The Attempt at a Solution



  • P(x) = x4 + ax3 + bx2 + cx + d
  • P′ (x) = 4x3 + 3ax2 + 2bx + c
  • P′ (0) = 0
  • c = 0

  • P′ (x) = 0 only at x = 0
  • P′ (x) is a cubic polynomial changing its sign from (–)ve to (+)ve and passing through O.
  • P′ (x) < 0 ∀ x < 0
  • P′ (x) > 0 ∀ x > 0
  • graph of P(x) is upward concave, where P′ (x) = 0

Now P(–1) < P(1)
⇒ P(–1) cannot be minimum in [–1, 1] as minima in this interval is at x = 0.

---------------------------------------------------------------
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------


The question is solved. That is not the problem. What I am wondering about right now is that such a logical question is too precious to be let go of without a discussion. Do you have any comments regarding either the geometrical interpretation or logical deduction of the answer?

For me, the questions are getting monotonous by the day and I have almost lost the thrill of learning because now the questions are just too clear. However, I am sure you will have a lot to discuss about it, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If anyone of you is a teacher - you must have had some sort of a frustrating experience on how the crystal clear logic doesn't even appeal to the students.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K