Calculus of Variations (Canonical equations)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the Euler-Lagrange equation and the canonical equations in the context of the calculus of variations. The functional defined is J(Y) = ∫(αY'^2 + βY^2) dx, leading to the Hamiltonian H = (p^2)/(4α) - βY^2. The canonical equations derived are dy/dx = p/(2α) and -dp/dx = -2βY. The participants clarify that differentiating the first equation with respect to x and substituting the first derivative of p will demonstrate the equivalence of the Euler-Lagrange equation to the canonical equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional analysis and calculus of variations
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Proficiency in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in detail
  • Explore Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications
  • Learn about the relationship between canonical equations and variational principles
  • Investigate higher-order differential equations and their solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or mechanics, particularly those interested in the calculus of variations and its applications in physics.

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
I've been looking at this example for a while now. Could someone help?

"Take the functional to be

J(Y) = \int_{a}^{b} \( \alpha Y'^2 + \beta Y^2) dx

For this

F(x,y,y') = \alpha y'^2 + \beta y^2

and p = \frac{ \partial F}{\partial y'} = 2 \alpha y'
\Rightarrow y' = \frac{p}{2 \alpha}

The Hamiltonian H is

H = py' - F = \frac {p^2}{4 \alpha} - \beta y^2

So the canonical equations are

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{ \partial H}{ \partial p} = \frac{p}{2 \alpha}
and

- \frac{dp}{dx} = \frac{\partial H} {\partial y} = -2 \beta y

I've also got the Euler Lagrange equation as

2 \beta y - \frac{d}{dx} (2 \alpha y') = 0

How can you tell that the Euler Lagrange equation is equivalent to the Canonical Euler equations in this set example?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate wrt "t" the eqn involving the first derivative of "y" and substitute the first derivative of p from the second and the resulting 2-nd order ODE in "y" will coincide with the Euler-Lagrange eqn for the lagrangian.
 
dextercioby said:
Differentiate wrt "t" the eqn involving the first derivative of "y"

Sorry, what do you mean by this?
 
Differentiate with respect to "x" (sorry, i thought it was "t", like in physics, where "t" stands for time) the first equation, the one involving dy/dx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K