Undergrad Why Must the Transversality Condition Be Less Than or Equal to Zero?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the transversality condition in optimal control theory, specifically why the derivative of the function F with respect to the velocity, evaluated at the endpoint, must be less than or equal to zero when the optimal trajectory meets the boundary condition x(t_1) = x_1. The reasoning is that if the derivative were positive, it would imply that the functional could increase with allowed variations, contradicting the requirement for a maximum. The Euler-Lagrange equation necessitates that the derivative equals zero for stationary points, but at the boundary, only non-negative variations are permissible. Thus, the condition ensures that the functional does not increase, maintaining the optimality of the solution. This establishes the necessity of the transversality condition being less than or equal to zero.
Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hey, I have a theorem I cannot prove.

We have a function x^* that maximizes or minimizes the integral:
\int^{t_1}_{t_0} F(t,x(t),\dot{x}(t))dt

Our end point conditions are:
x(t_0) = x_0, x(t_1) \geq x_1

I am told that x^* has to satisfy the Euler equation. That I can fully understand since x^*(t_1) can be equal to x_1. However, then it gives me the transversality condition:
\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)_{t=t_1} \leq 0 \text{ ( = 0 if $x^*(t_1) > x_1$)}

I can understand the statement in the parentheses. However, I do not understand why \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)_{t=t_1} must be less than or equal to zero if x^*(t_1) = x_1. Why can it not be more than zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The original variation of the functional (call the functional ##\mathcal F##) is given by
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \left( \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \delta x + \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \delta \dot x\right) dt.
$$
Integration by parts of the second term now leads to
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \left( \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} - \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \right) \delta x \, dt
+ \left[\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x} \delta x\right]_{t=t_0}^{t_1}.
$$
Since ##\delta x## is arbitrary, the Euler-Lagrange equation has to hold if ##x## is a stationary function of the functional. This, together with ##\delta x(t_0) = 0## leads to
$$
\delta \mathcal F = \left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} \delta x(t_1).
$$
It follows that to have a local stationary function, you must have
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} = 0.
$$
However, there is also the option of having a function at the boundary ##x(t_1) = x_1##. If you are at the boundary, then only variations ##\delta x(t_1) \geq 0## are allowed and therefore ##\delta \mathcal F## can only be positive if
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} > 0
$$
implying that the value of ##\mathcal F## would increase with the allowed variation. Your condition
$$
\left. \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}\right|_{t=t_1} \leq 0
$$
is therefore equivalent to requiring that ##\delta \mathcal F \leq 0##, i.e., that ##x^*## maximises the functional (at least locally). For a minimisation, you would get the opposite inequality.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K