[calculus] question about identify boundary curve between two surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the boundary curve formed by the intersection of two surfaces in three-dimensional space, described by the equations f1(x,y,z)=k and f2(x,y,z)=C. The original poster seeks clarification on whether the resultant equation f3, derived from f1 and f2, is sufficient to describe the intersection curve, or if additional information from either f1 or f2 is necessary for a complete description, particularly in the context of surface and line integrals using Stokes' theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the intersection and the potential need for parameterization or piecewise descriptions. There is uncertainty about the method of deriving f3 and its sufficiency in representing the intersection. An example involving a plane and a cylinder is presented to illustrate the concept of parameterization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding parameterization and the complexity of the surfaces involved, but no consensus has been reached on the necessity of f3 alongside f1 or f2.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may vary in complexity depending on the specific surfaces involved, and they highlight the importance of visualizing the intersection. There is an acknowledgment that the question is general and may not have a singular answer.

kougou
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two questions.
1) generally speaking, when we are given two equations both describing surface in R3:
f1(x,y,z)=k
and f2(x,y,z)=C,

The intersection of the two will be a curve that's by solving both equations. My question is, by solving f1 and f2 to get anther equation say f3, does f3 iteself enough to describe the intersection curve, OR do we need f3 AND one of f1 or f2 to describe the intersection? I am not talking about very complicated or special case situation.

I ask this question because we need it for computing surface integral or line integral using stroke's theorem. The first step of identifying the boundary is critical
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kougou said:

Homework Statement


I have two questions.
1) generally speaking, when we are given two equations both describing surface in R3:
f1(x,y,z)=k
and f2(x,y,z)=C,

The intersection of the two will be a curve that's by solving both equations. My question is, by solving f1 and f2 to get anther equation say f3, does f3 itself enough to describe the intersection curve, OR do we need f3 AND one of f1 or f2 to describe the intersection? I am not talking about very complicated or special case situation.

I ask this question because we need it for computing surface integral or line integral using stroke's theorem. The first step of identifying the boundary is critical

That's a very general question and I don't think there is a single answer to it. I don't know what you mean by "solving ##f_1## and ##f_2## to get ##f_3##". This type of problem often requires an appropriate parameterization or perhaps a piecewise description of the boundary. What method to use depends a lot on what particular equations you have, and you usually start with a good picture. Here's an example. Say your surfaces are the slanted plane ##x+y+z=4## and the cylinder ##x^2+y^2 = 1##. You would normally parameterize the cylinder in cylindrical coordinates ##\vec R(\theta,z) = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta,z\rangle##. Here ##\theta## takes you around and ##z## locates you vertically. If you want ##z## to be on the plane you could solve it for ##z##: ##z=4-x-y##, which, in terms of ##\theta## is ##z=4-\cos\theta-\sin\theta##. Putting that together gives the intersection curve in terms of ##\theta##:$$
\vec C(t) = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta,4-\cos\theta-\sin\theta\rangle$$where ##0\le\theta\le 2\pi##. Different surfaces might require an entirely different approach.
 
LCKurtz said:
That's a very general question and I don't think there is a single answer to it. I don't know what you mean by "solving ##f_1## and ##f_2## to get ##f_3##". This type of problem often requires an appropriate parameterization or perhaps a piecewise description of the boundary. What method to use depends a lot on what particular equations you have, and you usually start with a good picture. Here's an example. Say your surfaces are the slanted plane ##x+y+z=4## and the cylinder ##x^2+y^2 = 1##. You would normally parameterize the cylinder in cylindrical coordinates ##\vec R(\theta,z) = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta,z\rangle##. Here ##\theta## takes you around and ##z## locates you vertically. If you want ##z## to be on the plane you could solve it for ##z##: ##z=4-x-y##, which, in terms of ##\theta## is ##z=4-\cos\theta-\sin\theta##. Putting that together gives the intersection curve in terms of ##\theta##:$$
\vec C(t) = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta,4-\cos\theta-\sin\theta\rangle$$where ##0\le\theta\le 2\pi##. Different surfaces might require an entirely different approach.


Thank you
"by solving f1 and f2, to get f3"
what I meant is to get another equation f3, from f1 and f2. And f3 describes the values of the intersection
 
I assume you mean solving both f1, f2 for the same variable , and setting the equations equal to each other. Since surfaces are 2-dimensional, you should find a representation in one variable after setting the equations equal to each other. Think of a very simple case: the XZ plane and the YZ planes, intersecting in a curve. But it can get more complicated if your surfaces have volume, as in the intersection of spheres.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K