Came up with a second personalized proof (is it correct)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof related to trigonometric identities, specifically the relationship between sine and cosine functions. Participants are examining the correctness of a personalized proof involving angles and triangle properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the construction of angles in a triangle and questioning the validity of certain angle relationships. There are attempts to clarify the properties of right triangles and isosceles triangles, as well as the implications of angle bisectors.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the geometric setup. Some have offered alternative steps and interpretations, while others are seeking clarification on angle relationships and constructions.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be confusion regarding the perpendicularity of segments and the definitions of angles within the triangle. Participants are navigating through these assumptions to arrive at a clearer understanding of the proof.

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
.....
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
proof of sin(90 + theta) = cos(theta)
 

Attachments

  • MATH2.jpg
    MATH2.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
Well, I wouldn't say "by construction angle COD is also theta". Since OD is perpendicular to AE, the only thing that is true "by construction" is that angle ODE and ODA are right angles. Now, you can they show that COD is theta by using the fact that the two angles in a right triangle are complementary- but you should show that.
 
Wait. Am I missing something here. Shouldn't COD be 45-(theta/2) ?

AOE is an isosceles triangle. The perpendicular is also the angle bisector, right? Or have I understoond something wrong here?
 
Sorry.. after I looked at it... segment OD is not perp to segment AE.. and it doesn't have to be. I came up with a diff steps which I edited in the picture that I attached..
 

Attachments

  • MATH2.jpg
    MATH2.jpg
    20.8 KB · Views: 441

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K