Can a 747 Take Off on a Conveyor Belt?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RandyD123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around whether a Boeing 747 can take off from a conveyor belt that matches the speed of its wheels in the opposite direction. Participants explore various aspects of this scenario, including the role of thrust, wheel friction, and the implications of different surface types, such as water or conveyor belts. The conversation includes theoretical reasoning and practical considerations related to flight mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the plane can take off as long as there is sufficient engine thrust to propel it forward with respect to the air, regardless of the conveyor belt's speed.
  • Others suggest that the wording of the problem is ambiguous, particularly regarding how the conveyor belt interacts with the plane's wheels and whether it affects the plane's ability to generate lift.
  • A few participants propose that if the conveyor belt is designed to match the wheel speed, it may not exert significant force on the plane, allowing it to take off.
  • Some contributors introduce hypothetical scenarios, such as using pontoons instead of wheels, to illustrate their points about thrust and lift generation.
  • There is a contention regarding whether the wheels play a crucial role in the takeoff process, with some asserting that they do not significantly impact the plane's ability to fly.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions underlying the problem, including the definition of belt speed and the forces at play.
  • One participant mentions that if the scenario were valid, conveyor belts would be used on aircraft carriers, implying skepticism about the feasibility of the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the plane can take off from the conveyor belt. Multiple competing views remain, with ongoing debate about the relevance of thrust, wheel friction, and the specific conditions of the scenario.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the interaction between the plane and the conveyor belt, particularly concerning the forces involved and how they affect the plane's motion and lift generation.

  • #121
DaveC426913 said:
I can't believe this is still under discussion.

It doesn't matter what the wheels are doing - it's not a car.
A plane gets its forward motion via the air, using props or jets.
Once the thrust of the engines rises, the plane will accelerate with respect to the air - and eventually gain lift via air, as usual - no matter what the wheels are doing.

You can do whatever you want with the conveyor - move it as fast as you want - till the wheels blow, and the landing gear is worn down to nubs - the plane is still going to move forward, given sufficient thrust.

Full stop.

To clarify, it would matter slightly if only because the faster the wheels are turning, the more rolling friction the plane would likely experience, but this would only affect the rate at which the plane accelerates and would be very small compared to the overall thrust. I'd imagine that the wheels would simply catch fire and melt long before they moved fast enough to provide enough frictional force to stop the plane moving forward.

So yes, I fully agree (as I stated like 5 pages ago) that the rotation of the wheels is largely irrelevant because the engines, and therefore the forward force, really don't care what the wheels are doing. They only care about the air.

I feel like this thread has jumped the shark.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Lol... all in fun... :oldbiggrin:
OCR said:
Now...
Carry on.

[Edit to add a final clarification:]
"If you’re desperate to tell me that I’m wrong on the internet, don’t bother.

I’ve snuck onto the plane into first class with the #5 crowd and we’re busy finding out how many cocktails they’ll serve while we’re waiting for the treadmill to start.

God help us if, after the fourth round of drinks, someone brings up the two envelopes paradox." [1]

1[Source attribution]


Oh, and BTW... has anybody looked here ? ...
lmao-gif.gif



OCR said:
[End of edit to add a final clarification:]

Now...
Carry on.
 
Last edited:
  • #123
+25

Yes - it's that simple .
 
  • #124
DaveC426913 said:
...till the wheels blow, and the landing gear is worn down to nubs - the plane is still going to move forward, given sufficient thrust.
But... but... with a landing gear worn down to nubs, will the thrust be sufficient to reach take off speed within the length of a normal runway?
 
  • #125
DaveC426913 said:
I can't believe this is still under discussion.
Yes you CAN! This is PF :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #126
A.T. said:
But... but... with a landing gear worn down to nubs, will the thrust be sufficient to reach take off speed within the length of a normal runway?
Then we no longer have wheels and the question no longer applies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
  • #127
OCR said:
Oh, and BTW... has anybody looked here ?
Oh my stars & garters - XKCD has a forum??
Where have you been all my life?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #128
OCR said:
Oh, and BTW... has anybody looked here ? ...
lmao-gif-gif.gif
And with that, I think we can call this thread done. Thanks for helping out, folks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
849
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 280 ·
10
Replies
280
Views
78K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K