Can a Charge to Planck Mass Ratio Be Validly Calculated?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Meselwulf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mass Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The charge to Planck Mass ratio has been calculated as approximately 1.861721726984943 × 10-10 C/kg. This calculation, while not previously documented in scientific literature, is deemed valid by the author for the study of Planck Particles, which are theorized to exist for a duration of one Planck Time. The discussion highlights a gap in existing research regarding this ratio, suggesting a potential area for further exploration in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck Mass and Planck Time
  • Familiarity with fundamental charge (e) in physics
  • Basic knowledge of micro black holes and their properties
  • Concepts of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck Particles in quantum gravity theories
  • Explore existing literature on charge-to-mass ratios in particle physics
  • Investigate the role of Planck units in modern physics
  • Examine the concept of micro black holes and their theoretical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and anyone interested in the properties of fundamental particles and Planck-scale phenomena.

Meselwulf
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Is there anything wrong in saying there can be a charge to Planck Mass ratio?

I calculate it as

\frac{e}{M_p} \propto 1.861 721 726 984 943 \times 10^{-10} C/kg

But I find no references by any science that they have done this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently no one has calculated it before for a Planck Mass, but it is a perfectly valid move. I was doing this for my investigation into Planck Particles (micro black holes) which exist for roughly a Planck Time.

Thanks anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K