Can a civilization gather information from inside the event horizon?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spikenigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Event horizon Horizon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of a civilization gathering information from inside the event horizon of black holes. Participants explore various aspects of this scenario, including the physical implications of extending a magnetically reinforced pole into a black hole and the effects of gravitational forces and space contraction near the event horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a civilization uses a magnetically reinforced pole to extend into a black hole, questioning what would happen and whether information could be received from inside the event horizon.
  • Another participant asserts that the pole would break apart due to the extreme gravitational forces near the black hole.
  • Several participants discuss the concept of space contraction as one approaches the event horizon, suggesting that space contracts to zero at the event horizon, leading to an infinite distance from the pole to the event horizon.
  • Some participants clarify that time dilation is not the only factor preventing crossing the event horizon, emphasizing that an infinite amount of time and distance must be traversed.
  • One participant introduces a mathematical perspective, discussing the proper distance to the event horizon and how it can be finite, despite the singularity in the derivative at the event horizon.
  • Another participant elaborates on the implications of space-like geodesics inside the event horizon, stating that no object can remain static at a coordinate distance within the black hole's gravitational field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of space contraction and the implications for the proposed scenario. There is no consensus on whether the pole could provide information from inside the event horizon, and the discussion remains unresolved with competing interpretations of the physics involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the energy requirements of the pole, the neglect of tidal forces, and the complexities of gravitational effects near the event horizon. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific definitions of distance and the mathematical treatment of space contraction.

spikenigma
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
'Poking' the Event Horizon

Forgive what is probably a ridiculous scenario, I was having a discussion earlier :smile:

We have Black Hole A and Black Hole B of completely (or near) equal gravitational field strength.

http://img148.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole1.gif

A civilization has developed a magnetically re-enforced pole.

The pole is made up of smaller segments which produce a magnetic/dimagnetic field of arbitrary strength to hold it together and directly counteract gravity/gravitational distortions/stresses

The energy requirements of each segment can be easily met by the civilization at any time as needed - as long as it is not infinity.

The civilization extends the pole towards Black Hole A and Black Hole B (carefully)

http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole2.gif

The pole extends past the event horizon of each Black Hole

http://img530.imageshack.us/my.php?image=blackhole3.gif

assume time dilation is not an issue to the experimenters

questions:

* what happens?
* can the civilization theoretically receive information at speed of sound from the pole about the inside of the event horizon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spikenigma said:
* what happens?
The pole breaks apart.
 
Space is increasingly contracted radially as the even horizon is approached. At the event horizon space is contracted to zero. An infinite distance exists between the pole and the event horizon.
 
skeptic2 said:
Space is increasingly contracted radially as the even horizon is approached. At the event horizon space is contracted to zero. An infinite distance exists between the pole and the event horizon.
Huh? This makes no sense at all.
 
Space is contracted by the factor sqrt(1 - Vesc^2 / c^2) where Vesc is the escape velocity. At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.

Time dilation is not the only impediment to crossing the event horizon. Just as an infinite amount of time must pass before an object can cross the event horizon, an infinite distance must also be crossed.
 
At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.
A singularity in the derivative does not necessarily mean a singularity of the function (proper distance as a function of "r") itself. In fact, the distance is finite.
 
skeptic2 said:
Space is contracted by the factor sqrt(1 - Vesc^2 / c^2) where Vesc is the escape velocity. At the event horizon where Vesc = c space is contracted to zero resulting in an infinite distance between any object and the event horizon.

Hi Skeptic2

[itex]dr'=dr\sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)[/itex] only applies to the free-falling object that is falling at [itex]v=-\sqrt(2M/r)\,c[/itex] towards the BH, this is the process that means dr always equals 1 for the object free-falling from infinity (as the length contraction due to velocity (SR) cancels out the length expansion, [itex]dr'=dr\sqrt(1-2M/r)^{-1}[/itex] brought on by gravity (GR)). Only the static observer deep within the BH's gravitation field comes close to experiencing the 'infinite' curvature near the horizon. For the static observer, the distance to the EH is-

[tex]\Delta r'=\frac{\Delta r}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{2M+\Delta r}}}[/tex]

where Δr is the coordinate distance to the EH (distance as observed from infinity) and Δr' is the proper distance to the EH (distance as observed locally from the object within the gravitational field) and M=Gm/c2.

As it's already been pointed out, even without massive tidal forces near the event horizon, the pole would break simply due to the space-like geodesics that reside on the inside of the event horizon (i.e. no object can remain static at a coordinate distance r inside the EH).
 
Last edited:
The exact "proper distance" is, without approximation:
[tex]S=r_2\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_2}}-r_1\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_1}}+M\ln{\frac{r_2-M+r_2\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_2}}}{r_1-M+r_1\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_1}}}}[/tex]
(I think), which is finite even for r1=2M.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K