Can a Lightning Strike Kill Someone Flying in the Sky?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jared409
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential effects of lightning strikes on individuals flying in the sky, particularly in relation to whether being airborne would alter the lethality of a lightning strike compared to being on the ground. The scope includes theoretical considerations, conceptual clarifications, and references to real-world phenomena involving lightning strikes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while planes can safely conduct lightning strikes due to their conductive fuselage, a person in the air would likely be at risk if struck directly, as the electricity would flow through their body.
  • Others argue that a person cannot serve as an endpoint for lightning, as the current would need to continue to another destination, implying that survival odds might be better if the lightning does not directly strike the person.
  • There is a discussion about the various ways lightning can injure humans, including direct strikes and side splash, with some participants questioning the applicability of these scenarios to a person falling through the air.
  • A participant introduces the concept of equipotentiality, referencing how harm from electricity requires both an incoming and outgoing path, which could be relevant to understanding the risks involved in lightning strikes.
  • Some participants express confusion about terminology and concepts, indicating a need for clarification on the mechanics of lightning strikes and their effects on living beings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the mechanics of lightning strikes and their effects on individuals in the air. While there is some consensus on the dangers of direct strikes, the specifics of how lightning interacts with a person in flight remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in understanding the exact conditions under which lightning strikes occur and the assumptions about the paths electricity may take are present. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the terminology and concepts related to lightning.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the effects of lightning on living beings, those studying electrical phenomena, or anyone curious about the intersection of physics and real-world scenarios may find this discussion relevant.

Jared409
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I recently watched the movie Chronicle, and in it, one character is killed when he is flying in the sky and lightning strikes him (the lightning doesn't hit the ground afterwards, if that matters). Would this actually kill someone if they weren't touching the ground when they were struck? And does the answer apply for larger bodies, such as planes?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Planes get hit by lightning all the time. It usually just passes through the airplane body without harm, because fuselage is the most conductive part. Obviously, if a person who isn't sitting inside an aluminum capsule gets struck, the electricity will flow through the body, and be lethal more likely than not. However, that current still needs to flow somewhere. So a lightning can't strike a person in the air without passing through and going towards the ground or another cloud. A person cannot be an end-point for the lightning, because a person simply cannot hold that much charge.
 
So if the person wasn't the endpoint and the bolt continued to its endpoint at another cloud then the person would be fine?
 
Is the person in a metal shell or not? K^2 describes what happens in both cases.
 
Jared409 said:
So if the person wasn't the endpoint and the bolt continued to its endpoint at another cloud then the person would be fine?
Lightning has to continue on. Situation where person is at an end point is impossible. If a lightning does hit, that is, it goes through a person, survival odds are no better than on the ground. In fact, they are probably worse. Airplane fuselage is what protects people and equipment on a flight, by providing a better path for electricity. If the choices are human body or air, however, lighting will go through the body.
 
Jared409, Read about lightning. Get your vocabulary (terminology) straight, and don't believe everything people casually write here without checking up for yourself. Wikipedia is not always correct, but has a pretty good record. It also gives references at the bottom for you to go into more detail.

"Lightning strikes injure humans in several different ways:
• Direct strike, which is usually fatal.
• Contact injury, when the person was touching an object that was struck
• Side splash, when current jumped from a nearby object to the victim
• Ground strike, current passing from a strike through the ground into a nearby victim. A strike can cause a difference of potential in the ground (due to resistance to current in the Earth), amounting to several thousand volts per foot.
• Blast injuries, including hearing damage or blunt trauma by being thrown to the ground."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_strike
 
And how many of these are a possibility for a person falling through the air? The difference between relying on own knowledge and Wikipedia is that former requires at least some level of understanding.
 
K^2 said:
And how many of these are a possibility for a person falling through the air? The difference between relying on own knowledge and Wikipedia is that former requires at least some level of understanding.

Excuse me, please. I did not read and understand the OP beforehand. Thank you for your clarification. The term "person being an end point" was totally new to me. Sorry for being so hasty.
Bobbywhy
 
Bobbywhy said:
The term "person being an end point" was totally new to me.
In every case, harm occurs only when the current enters the body on one path. And leaves via some other limb.
 
  • #10
Thanks, I was asking this question with the whole "birds on a wire" concept in mind, thinking that if the current was just passing through the person/object, then the body in question wouldn't be harmed. Thanks for clearing this up
 
  • #11
Jared409 said:
Thanks, I was asking this question with the whole "birds on a wire" concept in mind, ...
Now let's expand on that concept. Lightning struck a tree maybe 10 meters from a cow. The cow dies. Did EMF kill the cow? No. The cow was struck directly. Electricity passed through that cow.

Lightning is a connection from the cloud to charges maybe 5 kilometers distant. An electrically shortest path might be 3 kilometers down to earth. And four kilometers through earth.

Also in that path is a cow. An electrically shortest path is up the cow's hind legs and down its fore legs. A direct strike to that cow.

Had the cow been surrounded by a buried wire loop, then electricity would not be incoming and outgoing. This is called a single point ground. Or equipotential. Same science is why humans are should stand with feet together. No incoming and outgoing path from and to earth.

But again, harm from electricity can only exist when both an incoming and outgoing path exists.
 
  • #12
Jared409 said:
I recently watched the movie Chronicle, and in it, one character is killed when he is flying in the sky...

Interesting question, but can you put "Spoiler Alert" in your title.

Sorry if that's too picky, but I hate when I'm not given the option to not be spoiled on a movie/book/whatever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
54K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K