Can a Semigroup with Finitely Many Elements and the Cancellation Law be a Group?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter T-O7
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A semigroup with finitely many elements that satisfies the Cancellation Law is indeed a group. The discussion confirms that if a semigroup S has the property that ab=ac implies b=c and ba=ca implies b=c, then every element in S must have an inverse. This conclusion is supported by applying the pigeonhole principle and demonstrating that the left multiplication map induces a bijective function, confirming that S is isomorphic to a subgroup of a permutation group. The ambiguity in the original question regarding the nature of the semigroup was clarified, establishing that all elements must satisfy the cancellation law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semigroups and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Cancellation Law in algebra
  • Knowledge of group theory and isomorphism
  • Basic principles of the pigeonhole principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of finite semigroups and their relation to groups
  • Learn about the pigeonhole principle and its applications in algebra
  • Explore the concept of isomorphism in group theory
  • Investigate semigroup actions and their implications in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone interested in group theory and semigroup properties will benefit from this discussion.

T-O7
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I'm having trouble on a question about semigroups which looks like it should be fairly straightforward:
If S is a semigroup with finitely many elements satisfying the Cancellation Law (i.e. ab=ac implies b=c and ba=ca implies b=c), then S is a group.

Anyone know how to go about this? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
don't know if this will help, but...

if a b = a c where a \neq 0

a b - a c = 0

a (b - c) = 0

since a \neq 0, b - c = 0

and then b = c


I hope this is somewhat useful (and correct :wink:)

Best!
 
sadly, dogma, this isn't a question about rings, and so one may not add elements like that, so strictly speaking it is not useful. nor is it correct since even if this were a question about rings it isn't specified that there are no zero divisors.

since the semi group is finite, you can show that the map f_x: a \to ax
induces a map to some general linear group, that shows the semigroup is also a group.

MOre directly, by repeated use of the pigeon hole principle using such maps, you may demonstrate that some f_x is the identity mapping, that inverses exist and you are done.
 
matt grime said:
sadly, dogma, this isn't a question about rings, and so one may not add elements like that, so strictly speaking it is not useful. nor is it correct since even if this were a question about rings it isn't specified that there are no zero divisors.

since the semi group is finite, you can show that the map f_x: a \to ax
induces a map to some general linear group, that shows the semigroup is also a group.

MOre directly, by repeated use of the pigeon hole principle using such maps, you may demonstrate that some f_x is the identity mapping, that inverses exist and you are done.

The original question was ambiguous about whether the semigroup contains finitely many elements (a finite semigroup) or the semigroup has a finite subset that satisfys the cancellation law.

An alternative approach would be to use a 'semi-group action':
Let's say the semi-group is H and |H|=n since H is finite. Then left multiplication by elements in H can be considered to be a permutation of the elements of H since semi-groups are closed over multiplication, and the cancellation rule forces the operation to be bijective. This means that H is isomorphic (I think that's the right word) to a subset of the elements of the permutation group of n elements - S_n, call it S. Then H must also be isomorphic to the subgroup generated by S since both are generated by multiplication.
 
Thanks NateTG, I realized that I had interpreted the ambiguous question incorrectly, and thought it meant "the semigroup has a finite subset that satisfies the cancellation law", when now I'm pretty the question is actually stating "the semigroup contains finitely many elements, ALL of which satisfy the cancellation law".

With the latter interpretation, I used your train of thought and showed that the "cosets" aS of the semigroup S was the semigroup itself (a\in S), and that consequently each element (using the cancellation law too) had an inverse in S. I assumed the semigroup S contains the identity, something that doesn't seem to occur in the usual definition of a semigroup, but is somehow given with it in my textbook.

Thanks everyone. :smile:
 
I read it is a semigroup with finitely many elements, and the semigroup has the cancellation property... since the most of the other interpretations are trivially false.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K