B Can a skateboarder ride faster by holding a water bottle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Devin-M
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a skateboarder can ride faster while holding a water bottle, with various opinions on the impact of added weight and balance. Some argue that a heavier bottle could help with balance during kicks, while others contend that the asymmetry and extra mass would hinder performance. The biomechanical complexities of balance and motion are highlighted, suggesting that manipulating body position is more effective than holding an object. Ultimately, most participants agree that while carrying a bottle might affect balance, it does not contribute to increased speed. The consensus leans towards the idea that added mass does not enhance speed in skateboarding.
  • #31
DaveC426913 said:
I'd think the asymmetry would be too small to make a difference, its not like we have trouble walking carrying a bottle.
Hey I didn't say the effect was large... :wink:
Devin-M said:
Yes, but the farther the inverted pendulum length extends (assume pendulum constant angle parallel to ground), the motor in the wheel needs to generate more torque to maintain the constant angle, leading to acceleration until the wind drag balances with increased torque at greater constant speed as the pendulum length increases.
I still don't understand what the segway example has to do with this.
Devin-M said:
Doesn’t the rider need some weight forward to prevent the kicks toppling them backward? For example a one wheel electric board, the more the rider leans forwards the faster the constant speed. For example gravity trying to topple the rider forward while the force from the wheel prevents this.
Don't these use gyroscopes to balance the board and rider?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Imagine you are moving the starship booster and try to accelerate it too quickly from the bottom- it’s going to topple over backwards. By having a counterweight sticking out towards the front you could accelerate it faster without toppling. The weight hanging off the front causes it to want to tip over in the forward direction which counterbalances the tendency to tip over backwards if you try to accelerate it too quickly by pushing towards the bottom.

IMG_7802.jpeg

IMG_7803.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • #33
Devin-M said:
Imagine you are moving the starship booster and try to accelerate it too quickly from the bottom- it’s going to topple over backwards.
This is a far cry from the man on a skateboard or the man on a Segway that you've been speaking of. In both of those cases, there is a very active suspension in place.

If performance over a timed quarter mile is your goal for safe booster transport then one could equally well put hydraulic pads under the thing and tilt it forward at a crazy angle to get the same effect as a guy standing on top with a water bottle in his out-stretched hand.

If I were the engineer in charge, I would not be very receptive to ideas which involve attaching gear to the booster or in filling the craft with shiftable fluids. I would have to think long and hard before engineering a dynamic support system instead of a rigid attachment to the conveyor. Fewer failure modes to anticipate. However, tire pressure would be something important to look at. Those look like more or less ordinary pneumatic tires. Non-rigid. If you've ever built a tower from foam blocks, you may understand the stability problems that could result.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #34
Using current booster transport setup, could we achieve greater acceleration without toppling by increasing the mass of the counterweights?
 
  • #35
Devin-M said:
Using current booster transport setup, could we achieve greater acceleration without toppling by increasing the mass of the counterweights?
Sure. Not sure why they would want to, but sure.

Where is this thread going? Was this the point the whole time? The meandering/lack of focus is really off-putting and doesn't lend itself to quality discussion. If this rocket wasn't the point, please get to the point rapidly.
 
  • #36
I was curious why I find myself naturally holding my water bottle forward while kicking on my skateboard (I would be carrying bottle in any case). That’s it. Im satisfied with the answers so far especially higher possible acceleration without toppling by increasing the mass of the counterweights on the starship booster transport system.
 
  • #37
Devin-M said:
I was curious why I find myself naturally holding my water bottle forward while kicking on my skateboard (I would be carrying bottle in any case). That’s it. Im satisfied with the answers so far....
I dont think you got the right answer, because you started by providing your own wrong answer and pushed the discussion in that direction. The main reason you extending your arms is to counterbalance the weight of your extended leg when it is off the ground. It has nothing directly to do with acceleration/thrust and isnt at all related to the SpaceX crawler.
 
  • Like
Likes Motore, PeroK and jbriggs444
  • #38
DaveC426913 said:
Again: A segway has a tilt sensor coupled to its motor electronically so that the speed is computer-controlled by the tilt. It's programmed to do that. (If it did it naturally, it wouldn't need a computer to coordinate it.)
It seems to me that there has to be a feedback mechanism built in.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #39
Devin-M said:
Imagine you are moving the starship booster and try to accelerate it too quickly from the bottom- it’s going to topple over backwards. By having a counterweight sticking out towards the front you could accelerate it faster without toppling. The weight hanging off the front causes it to want to tip over in the forward direction which counterbalances the tendency to tip over backwards if you try to accelerate it too quickly by pushing towards the bottom.
This is a bit of a red herring (i.e. while its technically true, it's not really applicable), here's why:

The booster is a rigid object. It can't deform to balance against acceleration. You can, and do.
The booster is an unstable object. It can't tilt to balance against acceleration. You can, and do.

So, what happens is: if you want to go faster, you simply crunch your body a little more or lean forward an extra couple of inches. The bottle does nothing but make that easier.

Here is the upshot:

You legs are the ultimate limiters on how fast you can go.

It's not that with the bottle you can go any faster - it's that with the bottle, you don't have to lean quite so far forward to achieve that same balance for your max acceleration. That's it.
 
  • #40
russ_watters said:
I dont think you got the right answer, because you started by providing your own wrong answer and pushed the discussion in that direction. The main reason you extending your arms is to counterbalance the weight of your extended leg when it is off the ground. It has nothing directly to do with acceleration/thrust and isnt at all related to the SpaceX crawler.
I agree. It is for a similar reason that one pumps the arms when running -- to keep the body more stable. Or why one does a preliminary lift with the hands when doing a standing broad jump -- to give the leg muscles a little more contact time and to give the body a little extra initial momentum. Or, for that matter, the same reason that one windmills the arms to save a fall from a ledge -- a temporary sink for unwanted angular momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #41
DaveC426913 said:
It's not that with the bottle you can go any faster - it's that with the bottle, you don't have to lean quite so far forward to achieve that same balance for your max acceleration. That's it.
I encourage people to try this while stationary. Pick up a fairly heavy object (water bottle, textbook, etc) and assume the position of the rider in the photo. Then extend your arm out in front of you. What happens? For me the change in balance was imperceptible and automatic.
 
  • #42
russ_watters said:
I encourage people to try this while stationary. Pick up a fairly heavy object (water bottle, textbook, etc) and assume the position of the rider in the photo. Then extend your arm out in front of you. What happens? For me the change in balance was imperceptible and automatic.
There is a similar test which could lead one to an alternate conclusion. Pick up something heavy (like a five gallon bucket of water) with the right hand and walk with it. Watch what you automatically do with the left hand.
You will automatically raise the left hand to reduce the leftward lean angle that your body would otherwise assume. This allows you to carry the bucket more easily without bumping it into your right hip and spilling water. [Better yet, grab a second bucket in the left hand and make half as many trips].

This behavior is not seen when holding a bucket with outstretched arm(s) in front of ones self because there is no convenient appendage that can be extended rearward. And because you may want both hands to support a bucket at arms length.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #43
When I’m actually on the board with water bottle I use it in 3 situations:

-While changing turning radius
-While accelerating with foot
-While decelerating with foot

To enter right hand turn:
-Lift water bottle to the right side with right arm
-Once desired constant turn radius is achieved lower arm
-To exit right turn switch bottle to left hand, raise left arm to left until straightened out, then lower arm

To enter left hand turn:
-Lift water bottle to the left side with left arm
-Once desired constant turn radius is achieved lower arm
-To exit left turn switch bottle to right hand, raise right arm to right until straightened out, then lower arm

To accelerate:
-Lift water bottle rigidly forward with right arm
-Kick 3 times with left leg, only right foot touches board
-Lower arm and bottle

To decelerate:
-Lift water bottle rigidly behind me with left arm
-Kick 3 times to slow down with left leg, only right foot touching board
-Lower arm and bottle
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Motore
  • #44
See 5:20:
 
  • #45
Devin-M said:
See 5:20:
You tell us what you see.
 
  • #46
Well he says in video you “throw your upper body forward so that way you can get as much from each push as possible.”
 
  • #47
Devin-M said:
Well he says in video you “throw your upper body forward so that way you can get as much from each push as possible.”
Yes. You can do this with your body.

Assuming you are a 70kg man, you mass about 200x more than a 355mL bottle of water. So, carrying the water, you are now a 70.355kg man. Anything you can do with a 70.355kg body, you can do with a 70.000kg body.

The bottle makes it a little easier to get that 1/200th of your combined mass two feet further forward. But don't be mistaken, you would accomplish the same thing without a bottle of water by simply leaning forward an imperceptible fraction of a degree more. And by imperceptible, I mean, you won't even know you're doing it.
 
  • #48
Devin-M said:
Well he says in video you “throw your upper body forward so that way you can get as much from each push as possible.”
He's not 'throwing' his upper body forward. He's leaning forward very slightly, bringing his body lower to the ground, and swinging his arms upwards and out to the front. Lowering your body lets your leg extend further backwards to push you, while bringing your arms up and forwards counteracts the down and backwards motion of your leg.

I remain convinced that your acceleration is limited by the physical ability of your legs than anything to do with balance.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #49
Devin-M said:
Well he says in video you “throw your upper body forward so that way you can get as much from each push as possible.”

Drakkith said:
He's not 'throwing' his upper body forward. He's leaning forward very slightly, bringing his body lower to the ground, and swinging his arms upwards and out to the front. Lowering your body lets your leg extend further backwards to push you, while bringing your arms up and forwards counteracts the down and backwards motion of your leg.

I remain convinced that your acceleration is limited by the physical ability of your legs than anything to do with balance.
I agree with @Drakkith that there's two different things going on here and the thrust is not a function of balance. To the extent that anything is being "thrown forward" (the arms) while your foot is on the ground, it moves your center of gravity forward, increasing your speed. See also: jumping and diving. I suppose if you have a water bottle already it may help to hold it in your hands, but adding a water bottle if you didn't already have one would reduce acceleration not increase it.

After your foot leaves the ground, it's about balance - you bring your leg forward and your arms backwards to keep your COG moving at constant speed.
 
  • #50
So are you saying I can’t get a longer stroke with my leg if I move the bottle forward during the stroke compared to keeping the bottle and my hands at my sides?
 
  • #51
Devin-M said:
So are you saying I can’t get a longer stroke with my leg if I move the bottle forward during the stroke compared to keeping the bottle and my hands at my sides?
1. No. Again: try it. I mean it. Right now. Stand up and lean forward, sticking your leg out horizontally behind you. You can stick your leg out horizontally without the need of a water bottle. You cannot increase your stride length by adding a water bottle/counterweight because you can already make it equal to your leg length without it.
2. That's a different claim from what you were claiming originally. Your original claim was that the leaning forward opposed the thrust, which is wrong/backwards (you have to lean backwards against your leg during the thrust, not forward away from it). If the SpaceX rocket on the transporter accelerates too fast it falls backwards, but if you accelerate too fast on a skateboard you fall forwards.

[edit] There's some additional complexity here due to body position. If the body is vertical and rigid and you apply the force below the center of gravity and the torque is larger than the opposing torque from the wheel friction you fall backwards. But when you squat and lean you align your center of gravity with the propulsion force -- and that force is far larger than the wheel friction. You're leaning back slightly to apply a forward force on the skateboard while accelerating forwards.
 
Last edited:
  • #52
Isn’t it then conceivable that I could get my leg further back with a water bottle in my outstretched hand, and that a longer stroke could conceivably deliver more power?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Motore
  • #53
Devin-M said:
Isn’t it then conceivable that I could get my leg further back with a water bottle in my outstretched hand,
No. Again: try it!
 
  • #54
When I shred wood, I’ve found that “throwing” my arms in front of me helps me generate a greater impulse from my pushing foot on the ground, as long as I have the right timing and stay in balance.

I’d think that I’d be able to go faster on my push with added weight in my hands. Will test later.
 
  • #55
Devin-M said:
Isn’t it then conceivable that I could get my leg further back with a water bottle in my outstretched hand, and that a longer stroke could conceivably deliver more power?
What does the water bottle have to do with how far you can stretch you leg out? That's appears to me to mostly be a function of how close to the ground you can get your body. The further down you go, the more parallel to the ground your leg can get, which increases the distance it can push before becoming fully extended. But there is likely a point that you're too close to the ground and your leg cant bend correctly to get the optimum push, so there's probably a sweet point that's slightly different for everyone based on their exact proportions and board height.

Keep in mind that the body is perfectly capable of balancing on its own without added weight. See this image:
a-pose-balancing-on-one-foot-1e-both-hands-forward.jpg


I just don't see any way that adding weight to your hands could help you stretch out more than you already can.

Perhaps the best evidence that adding weight to your hands doesn't help is that highly skilled professional and amateur skateboarders don't use them. Not that I know of at least.

SphericalCow said:
When I shred wood, I’ve found that “throwing” my arms in front of me helps me generate a greater impulse from my pushing foot on the ground, as long as I have the right timing and stay in balance.
What does 'shredding wood' mean?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #56
Drakkith said:
Perhaps the best evidence that adding weight to your hands doesn't help is that highly skilled professional and amateur skateboarders don't use them. Not that I know of at least.
All actual skateboarding sports involve balance and thus require ease of arm movement. A water bottle would be terrible for ease of arm movement, so you don't see it very often.

However, OP's question is specific- they are asking about the effect a water bottle has on your ability to push on a skateboard. This is different, because the requirement for balance is much lower than when at the park or longboarding down a hill. As OP and I have noticed, holding a water bottle changes how we push on a skateboard.
Drakkith said:
What does 'shredding wood' mean?
Skateboarding.
I just tried pushing around with a water bottle. This is what happened:

I push with my right foot, and I hold the water bottle in my right hand. I face forward, center my weight, and as I start to plant my foot on the ground, I swing the water bottle ever so slightly back, so that it's to the right of my waist with my elbow in a 90 degree angle. Then, as I push off the ground, I swing my arm forward, maintaining the 90 degree angle until the bottle is in front of my sternum, and the process repeats.

It feels like I'm able to generate a greater impulse between my right foot and the ground, thus making me faster. I assume this has something to do with the increased torque from my arm, or how my weight can shift in a different way that lets me increase the friction force from my flip flop.
 
  • #57
Drakkith said:
Keep in mind that the body is perfectly capable of balancing on its own without added weight. See this image:
a-pose-balancing-on-one-foot-1e-both-hands-forward.jpg
Compared to this image the skateboarder has their knee bent as much as possible to prolong the push:

IMG_7804.jpeg
 
  • #58
Devin-M said:
Compared to this image the skateboarder has their knee bent as much as possible to prolong the push:
I know. I was illustrating that a person doesn't need extra weight to balance themselves with their leg fully extended.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #59
SphericalCow said:
It feels like I'm able to generate a greater impulse between my right foot and the ground, thus making me faster. I assume this has something to do with the increased torque from my arm, or how my weight can shift in a different way that lets me increase the friction force from my flip flop.
I remain unconvinced, but my skepticism obviously has no bearing on whether or not this is actually true. Keep testing if you want. Grab some other skateboarders and see what you guys can come up with.
 
  • #60
SphericalCow said:
It feels like I'm able to generate a greater impulse between my right foot and the ground, thus making me faster. I assume this has something to do with the increased torque from my arm, or how my weight can shift in a different way that lets me increase the friction force from my flip flop.
Aside from feeling not being an objective measure you have now introduced potentially insufficient traction as another parameter, beyond the balance question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K