Can a Square Wave at 500 kHz and 2.5 kV Be Achieved?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of generating a square wave signal at 500 kHz and 2.5 kV, particularly for use in an electro-optic deflector application. Participants explore the technical challenges, potential solutions, and available commercial products related to high voltage and high frequency signal generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about achieving a square wave at 500 kHz and over 1 kV, suggesting it may be difficult.
  • One participant mentions the importance of rise times, proposing a maximum rise time of 0.5 µs to approximate a square wave at 500 kHz.
  • Another participant suggests using a high frequency transformer to create harmonics that could reconstruct a square wave, acknowledging potential phase distortion issues.
  • A participant indicates that the application involves modulating a laser beam with an electro-optic deflector, requiring at least 1.5 kV, preferably 2.5 kV, and expresses doubt about achieving the desired square wave.
  • Some participants recommend contacting companies that manufacture amplifiers for piezo drivers, suggesting they might offer custom designs or suitable products.
  • One participant mentions the availability of high voltage/high frequency switches and provides links to products that may meet the requirements.
  • Another participant shares a specific lab unit that could potentially fulfill the needs of the original poster.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that achieving a square wave at the specified frequency and voltage is challenging, and multiple competing views on potential solutions and available technology remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the feasibility of the original request.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the technical specifications and limitations of available equipment, as well as the specific requirements of the application. There are unresolved questions about the load characteristics and the exact nature of the signal needed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to graduate students, researchers, or engineers working with high voltage electronics, signal generation, or electro-optic applications.

grae313
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've been told that a square wave at this speed and > 1 kV P-P won't happen, but I need one, and our lab has plenty of funding. Is this possible? Commercially available? If 500 kHz is out of the question, what about 100 kHz? Any information is appreciated--I don't know **** about electronics :(
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
grae313 said:
I've been told that a square wave at this speed and > 1 kV P-P won't happen, but I need one, and our lab has plenty of funding. Is this possible? Commercially available? If 500 kHz is out of the question, what about 100 kHz? Any information is appreciated--I don't know **** about electronics :(

I guess I need to talk about rise times... it just needs to be an improvement over a sine wave, so I guess maximum rise time would be 0.5 us to produce a square-ish wave at 500 kHz.
 
That is very likely going to be tough. What's the load?
 
A 1,000 Volts square wave?! What kind of application needs a signal like that?

Have your engineers tried simulating an ideal square wave connected to a high frequency transformer? Some transformers can go up to about 3MHz or more. That would allow plenty of harmonics to slip through and rebuild a reasonable approximation of a square wave on the high voltage side.

The transformer will, of course, have some frequency dependent phase distortion. On the generator side, you can deliberately create harmonics and phase shift them in a way that cancels the effect of the transformer. That way, the main 500MHz oscillation and all it's harmonics will add up to a square wave just like a Fourier transform on the high voltage side.

Anyway, that was just me brainstorming. I saw an 800V thyristor on Digi-key. That's almost strong enough for your app. I don't track trends in power semiconductors so who knows what you can get if you know the right people to call. There may be a 1000V switch you can buy right off the shelf.

Good luck.
 
es1 said:
That is very likely going to be tough. What's the load?

Uh... like I said I don't know **** about electronics :shy: But the voltage I need is headed for plates on either side of a crystal (an electro-optic deflector) so I think the load would just be a result of the capacitance of the configuration? The capacitance is around 50 picofarads.
 
Okefenokee said:
A 1,000 Volts square wave?! What kind of application needs a signal like that?

I want to modulate the position of a laser beam using an electro-optic deflector, and the deflection sensitivities of EODs are in microradians per volt. I'll need at least 1.5 kV for the design to be feasible at all, 2.5 would be better, and I want a square wave because there should be some dwell time to the beam at its peaks.

Okefenokee said:
Have your engineers...
Heh. I'm a graduate student in physics. I have no engineers :frown: I also have no idea what you're talking about! Anyways, it's sounding like the answer to 500 kHz, 2.5 kV square wave is heck no.

A sine wave with these specs is easy to achieve. Is there any way to modify it somehow to get it a bit squarer? :confused: Sorry for my ignorance and thanks for the suggestions...
 
grae313 said:
Heh. I'm a graduate student in physics. I have no engineers ...

Have you tried contacting any of the companies that make similar products (e.g. amplifiers for piezo drivers)?

This one comes pretty close to what you need if you use two

http://www.lab-systems.com/products/amplifier/a303.html

Also, even if this is not exactly what you need they might be able to come up with a custom design (At a price of course), at 450kHz BW you should be able to get a decent square wave at 100 kHz.
 
f95toli said:
Have you tried contacting any of the companies that make similar products (e.g. amplifiers for piezo drivers)?

I sent off a few emails so I'll see what kind of responses I get. Thanks for the suggestion.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
10K