Can a static electron be influenced by a magnetic field due to its charge?

Click For Summary
A static electron, defined as one that is stationary relative to a magnetic field, will not experience a force from that magnetic field, as described by the Lorentz force equation. However, if the magnetic field is time-dependent, it induces an electric field according to Faraday's Law, which can then exert a force on the electron. The interaction of electric and magnetic fields is crucial, as they are components of the unified electromagnetic field. Additionally, the influence of the electron's own charge and the associated radiation reaction complicates the analysis, making it a challenging topic in classical electrodynamics. Therefore, while a static electron is unaffected by a static magnetic field, it can be influenced by time-varying fields.
aditya ver.2.0
Messages
67
Reaction score
4
Will a static electron be influenced by a magnetic field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by static electron?

Do you mean a stationary electron relative to a static magnetic field like an ordinary magnet?

The force on the electron is: F = qv x B where q is the charge of the electron and v is its velocity and B is the magnetic field vector.

So ask yourself what is the force on the electron if it's not moving and that should answer your question.
 
Well, if there's only a magnetic field in the restframe of the electron, there'll be no force on the electron (see the previous posting). But if the magnetic field is time-dependent there's also an electric field due to Faraday's Law,
$$\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}+\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.$$
Then, of course the force on the electron is the full Lorentz force,
$$\vec{F}=q \left (\vec{E}+\frac{\vec{v}}{c} \times \vec{B} \right ).$$
So then it will be affected. You have to always look at both the electric and the magnetic field. In fact, electric and magnetic fields are just a split of the one and only electromagnetic field into components with respect to an arbitrary inertial reference frame.

NB: I always use Heaviside-Lorentz units, because they are the most natural ones for electromagnetism.
 
  • Like
Likes muscaria
vanhees71 said:
Well, if there's only a magnetic field in the restframe of the electron, there'll be no force on the electron (see the previous posting). But if the magnetic field is time-dependent there's also an electric field due to Faraday's Law,
$$\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}+\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.$$
Then, of course the force on the electron is the full Lorentz force,
$$\vec{F}=q \left (\vec{E}+\frac{\vec{v}}{c} \times \vec{B} \right ).$$
So then it will be affected. You have to always look at both the electric and the magnetic field. In fact, electric and magnetic fields are just a split of the one and only electromagnetic field into components with respect to an arbitrary inertial reference frame.NB: I always use Heaviside-Lorentz units, because they are the most natural ones for electromagnetism.
May we say, therefore, that the electrons in a receiving antenna move only in response to the E-field of a passing wave?
 
No, because when the electron moves, there's also a force due to the magnetic field, as written above.
 
vanhees71 said:
Well, if there's only a magnetic field in the restframe of the electron, there'll be no force on the electron (see the previous posting). But if the magnetic field is time-dependent there's also an electric field due to Faraday's Law,
$$\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}+\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.$$

What did you do with the charge? Doesn't it produce a field?
 
The charge produces of course a field, and in principle you have to take it into account. This is the socalled "radiation reaction" and is a tremendously difficult problem, which has not a full resolution for a point partice within classical electrodynamics. Have a look at the usual textbooks (Landau Lifshitz vol. II, Jackson etc.).
 
  • Like
Likes muscaria

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K