Can an Astronaut Do a Backflip in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaldenpage
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An astronaut can perform a 360-degree backflip in space by utilizing the conservation of angular momentum, even without gravity or the ability to push off another mass. The discussion highlights that similar principles apply to spacecraft, where components can be manipulated to induce rotation without thrust, as seen in systems like reaction wheels and control moment gyroscopes. The ability of cats to right themselves in free-fall is referenced as a parallel to human motion in microgravity, although humans have not yet successfully mimicked this behavior. Overall, the mechanics of rotation in both humans and spacecraft rely on fundamental physics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum
  • Familiarity with microgravity environments
  • Knowledge of reaction wheels and control moment gyroscopes
  • Basic principles of rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of angular momentum in microgravity
  • Explore the design and function of reaction wheels in spacecraft
  • Study the biomechanics of animal motion in free-fall, particularly cats
  • Investigate the principles of rotational dynamics in engineering applications
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, educators in physics, and anyone interested in the mechanics of motion in microgravity environments.

jaldenpage
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework problem or anything, it's just something I'm in a debate with someone about. Theoretically, if an astronaut were left stranded in the center of a room without the ability to push off of anything and without any means of propulsion -- would the astronaut be able to do a 360 degree backflip (or forward flip)?

Does this movement require gravity, momentum, or the ability to push off of another mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that they absolutely could do a flip. They would just need to windmill their arms, and due to conservation of angular momentum, their body would rotate in the opposite direction from their arms.
 
Follow up question:

If a human can do this rotation, does this mean that in theory a spaceship that is moving but not accelerating could choose to start rotating simply by moving its parts correctly? I'm talking about a rotation with little to no effect on direction and without using thrust.
 
jaldenpage said:
This isn't a homework problem or anything, it's just something I'm in a debate with someone about. Theoretically, if an astronaut were left stranded in the center of a room without the ability to push off of anything and without any means of propulsion -- would the astronaut be able to do a 360 degree backflip (or forward flip)?

Does this movement require gravity, momentum, or the ability to push off of another mass?

I'm also going to say yes, because cats are able to right themselves in free-fall. Whether or not an astronaut is flexible enough to copy the motion, I can't say.

http://helix.gatech.edu/Classes/ME3760/1998Q3/Projects/Nguyen/

The site specifically mentions that humans have so far been unable to copy the motion.

http://web.archive.org/web/19980528...g/publications/technique/1997/2/twisting.html

Seems to indicate there is a difference between twisting and flipping as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jaldenpage said:
Follow up question:

If a human can do this rotation, does this mean that in theory a spaceship that is moving but not accelerating could choose to start rotating simply by moving its parts correctly? I'm talking about a rotation with little to no effect on direction and without using thrust.

Yes if the spaceship were designed to be able to do this. If the ship was one ring inside another ring and could rotate, then the act of rotating would cause the outer ring to spin opposite of the inner ring.
 
jaldenpage said:
Follow up question:

If a human can do this rotation, does this mean that in theory a spaceship that is moving but not accelerating could choose to start rotating simply by moving its parts correctly? I'm talking about a rotation with little to no effect on direction and without using thrust.

Yep. See "reaction wheels" and "control moment gyroscopes" for details. Many satellites use these techniques for attitude control, since they don't need any fuel.
 
I wonder if a cat, already knowing it is fully or partially inverted prior to fall, does not start the twist prior to drop/release, thus using the static holder as a twist initiation.
 
A very good video of a falling cat. It's clear there is no need to push off the static holder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t84a0L76ju4&feature=related

It's all in the way it alternatively adjusts the lengths of its legs:

1. Bend forward legs + extend backward legs simultaneously,
2. Twist waist half-way : this right-sides up the torso and head,
3. Bend rear legs + extend forward legs,
4. Twist waist half-way : this right-sides up the butt.

It's all there is to it.
 
Last edited:
Excellent video! the cat looks like it's counter-rotating about the spine... too cool.
 
  • #10
jaldenpage said:
If a human can do this rotation, does this mean that in theory a spaceship that is moving but not accelerating could choose to start rotating simply by moving its parts correctly? I'm talking about a rotation with little to no effect on direction and without using thrust.

That's what Hubble does if memory serves me well.

Andy Resnick said:
Whether or not an astronaut is flexible enough to copy the motion, I can't say.

I don't think you need to be specially flexible, seems to me that just rotating your arms should do the trick.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K