Can an Atom Exist Without Electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gary King
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Electrons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether an atom can exist without electrons, exploring theoretical and practical implications in chemistry and physics. Participants examine various examples, definitions, and the nature of ions and nuclei.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that it is possible for an atom to have no electrons, citing examples like hydrogen ions (H+) and alpha particles (He2+).
  • Others argue that alpha particles are not atoms but rather helium nuclei, which do not have the same properties as neutral helium atoms.
  • A participant questions the definition of an atom, suggesting that an atom without electrons would not be uncharged and therefore would not meet the criteria of being an atom.
  • Some participants mention that while certain ions can exist without electrons, they are not stable and require significant energy to form.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of stripping electrons from larger atoms and the challenges associated with it.
  • Participants note that fully charged plasmas and certain high-energy states can be produced in laboratory settings, but these are typically transient and not representative of stable atomic structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of an atom and whether certain charged species can be classified as atoms. No consensus is reached regarding the existence of atoms without electrons, and multiple competing perspectives remain.

Contextual Notes

Definitions of atoms and ions are debated, with some participants emphasizing the importance of charge neutrality in the definition of an atom. The discussion also highlights the instability of certain ionic states and the conditions under which they may be produced.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in chemistry and physics, particularly those exploring atomic structure, ionization, and the behavior of charged particles in various states of matter.

  • #31
chem_tr said:
ZapperZ, I am doubtful about this. When you write the alpha particle, ^{4}_{2}He, you'll see that two electrons are present as this compound is neutral and monoatomic. You'd be correct if this compound were a 2+ ion. Or is there something I don't know?

Surely the symbol you quoted refers to The overall number of Nucleons, and the fact that there are two protons, the rest being neutrons, hence 2 protons and 2 neutrons?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think it is a very trivial and useless question. Everyone I know considers an "atom" to be the bound state of a nucleus (Z) and some number of electrons. It is trivially obvious that bare nuclei can and DO exist, so if you want to call them atoms, go ahead!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K