Can an EE Major Help Prevent Nuclear Terrorism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hammertime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career Security
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential career paths for an Electrical Engineering (EE) major interested in contributing to the prevention of nuclear terrorism. It explores various technologies, organizations, and roles that could be relevant to this field, including sensor development and government positions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to use their EE skills to develop sensors for detecting gamma rays and harmful chemicals, particularly in the context of preventing nuclear terrorism.
  • Another suggests exploring career opportunities with the FBI, National Labs, and Military labs.
  • A different viewpoint proposes working for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), emphasizing its global importance rather than direct national security.
  • One post humorously suggests infiltrating terrorist groups to sabotage them from within, which is not a serious career suggestion.
  • There is mention of high demand for engineers in agencies like the CIA, NSA, and DoD, with advanced degrees potentially leading to positions at national labs such as LANL or LLNL.
  • A participant inquires about advancements in nuclear detection technology, specifically the feasibility of airborne sensors capable of detecting highly enriched uranium in urban environments.
  • Another contributor highlights the interest of armed services in hiring engineers.
  • Several government organizations are mentioned as potential employers, including the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Defense Threat Reduction Agency, along with advice to explore job listings on usajobs.com.
  • There is a cautionary note regarding the challenges of detecting alpha decay behind shielding materials like lead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of career options and technologies, but there is no consensus on the best path or specific technologies being developed. The discussion remains open with multiple competing views on the effectiveness and feasibility of different approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the lack of specific information on current technological developments in nuclear detection and the varying levels of entry into different organizations, which may depend on qualifications and experience.

hammertime
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I'm an EE major and I kind of want to go into a job where my skills can be used to make this country safer against terrorism. I understand that the risk of terrorism is small, but the consequences of a chemical, biological, or radiological strike would be unspeakable. I want to prevent such nightmarish scenarios.

So what could I do for a career? I mentioned sensing. Would that be a good career choice? Developing sensors that can pick up on gamma rays or use spectroscopy to detect harmful chemicals before they're released sounds pretty good.

I especially want to work to prevent nuclear terrorism. So what could an EE major do? What technologies are being developed? What about airborne or space-based sensor systems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's all kinds of options- the FBI, National Labs, Military labs... get thee to your career office and inquire.
 
Another possible route might be to consider working for the International Atomic Energy Agency who are related to the UN, its not such a direct path to your own national security, but is still very important work, for the world as a whole.
 
You could always sign up for the terrorist groups, then sabotage them from the inside...
 
The CIA,NSA,DoD..etc. has a very high demand for engineers.

You could get a M.S or Ph.D and get some work at say LANL or LLNL.
 
Just out of curiosity, does anyone here know what developments are being made in nuclear detection technology? Is there anything like, say, an airborne sensor that can detect the tiniest amount of highly enriched uranium, even if its shielded behind a large amount of lead, in a bustling metropolis like NYC from thousands of feet in the air? Are any developments being made towards that kind of technology?
 
I would be remiss in pointing out that the armed services would be delighted to have you.
 
Government-wise, look into the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and (especially) the Defense Threat Reduction Agency; you should just list all their open positions on usajobs.com and see what the generic engineering jobs look like. DHS also has a Nuclear Detection Office, and State I believe has a counterproliferation office, but most things there aren't entry-level. The Homeland Security Institute (DHS's think tank) does a lot of work on domestic CBRN threats, but they're mostly PhD level and not doing technology development. And as others have mentioned, the relevant national labs (in particular, PNNL and Sandia, plus LLNL, LANL, probably others).

There are undoubtedly dozens if not hundreds of contractors out there competing for dollars from congresspersons whose constituents have bought into the "unspeakable" rhetoric on CBR; I can't give you specific names offhand, but some creative Googling should show some (and maybe look at the web sites of the various offices I listed above and see if they have reports or mention of contractors).

Oh, and detecting alpha decay behind a few sheets of paper is nigh on impossible, to say nothing of lead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K