Can an insulator reflect radiowaves?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter garryA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insulator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the ability of insulators to reflect radiowaves, exploring the relationship between impedance, refractive index, and reflection coefficients. Participants examine theoretical aspects, practical implications, and specific materials in the context of electromagnetic wave behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the reflection of radiowaves depends on the characteristic impedance of materials, with a mismatch from the free space impedance leading to reflection.
  • Others argue that insulators can reflect radiowaves, albeit not as effectively as metals, with claims that up to 90% of the energy may pass through insulators.
  • A few participants mention that the refractive index of dielectric materials is crucial for understanding reflection, noting that it varies across the electromagnetic spectrum.
  • Some participants question the validity of high surface impedance for insulators as a means of achieving good reflection, suggesting that mainstream physics does not support this idea.
  • There are mentions of specific materials, such as paraffin wax, demonstrating total internal reflection at microwave frequencies, indicating that insulators can exhibit reflective properties under certain conditions.
  • Participants discuss the concept of High-Impedance Surfaces (HIS) and their potential use as reflectors, although there is uncertainty about the materials used to construct these surfaces.
  • Some participants clarify the distinction between electrical impedance and characteristic impedance, emphasizing the need for precise definitions in the context of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the reflective properties of insulators, with no consensus reached on the conditions under which insulators may effectively reflect radiowaves.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of impedance, the frequency dependence of refractive indices, and the specific conditions under which insulators may reflect radiowaves. The discussion also highlights the complexity of electromagnetic wave behavior across different materials.

garryA
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
So, when a radiowave strike a surface, whether the wave get reflected or not depend a lot on the characteristic impendence of it. If the radiowave travel from free space to a material. Any mismatch from the approx. 377 ohms impedance of free space (Z0) will result in a reflected wave; the greater the mismatch, the greater the amount reflected. Since conductor such as metal has very low impedance therefore good at reflecting radiowave. But how about insulator?. Could an insulator have the impendence high enough (much higher than free space value) that make it also reflect radiowave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garryA said:
Could an insulator have the impendence high enough (much higher than free space value) that make it also reflect radiowave?
AFAIK, the ##Z_0## of free space is as high as you can get. You can get lower values of ##Z_0## with different dielectrics that you propagate through.

The value to look at is the refractive index ##n## of the dielectric material, compared to whatever is surrounding it. For a vacuum, ##n=1##, and for water and other dielectrics, ##n>1##. See this Wikipedia page for more information on how to calculate the amount of EM reflected by the interface:

1655235073512.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Delta2, DaveE and 1 other person
berkeman said:
AFAIK, the ##Z_0## of free space is as high as you can get. You can get lower values of ##Z_0## with different dielectrics that you propagate through.

The value to look at is the refractive index ##n## of the dielectric material, compared to whatever is surrounding it. For a vacuum, ##n=1##, and for water and other dielectrics, ##n>1##. See this Wikipedia page for more information on how to calculate the amount of EM reflected by the interface:

View attachment 302829
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
Here's a link about index of refraction:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/refr.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
You should be careful with the index of refraction. It is not a constant valid for the whole Em spectrum. The index for visible light does not have to be similar to that for low frequency radiowaves. It makesmore sense to look to the reflectivity in the specififc frequncy domain. Or look for the dielectric constant of the dielectric in that frequency domain.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, dlgoff, vanhees71 and 1 other person
berkeman said:
AFAIK, the ##Z_0## of free space is as high as you can get. You can get lower values of ##Z_0## with different dielectrics that you propagate through.
So in short insulator can still reflect radio wave, just not as good as metal?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
garryA said:
So in short insulator can still reflect radio wave, just not as good as metal?
Yes insulators are poor reflectors, I think up to 90% of the energy of the incident wave passes through.
 
Delta2 said:
Yes insulators are poor reflectors, I think up to 90% of the energy of the incident wave passes through.
Someone told me that insulator can have very high surface impedance much higher than the 377 ohms value, therefore they can be good reflector. What do you guys think?
 
garryA said:
Someone told me that insulator can have very high surface impedance much higher than the 377 ohms value, therefore they can be good reflector. What do you guys think?
This is not correct according to mainstream physics. Maybe some unknown experimental material can have i don't know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garryA and dlgoff
garryA said:
Someone told me
That is not a valid reference for discussion at PF.

And as you can see from the EM reflection equation that I posted from Wikipedia, the DC resistance of a material does not enter into that calculation. Reflection from conductors is governed by other equations, but you were asking about insulators/dielectrics, so that's the question that I addressed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
  • #10
garryA said:
Someone told me that insulator can have very high surface impedance much higher than the 377 ohms value, therefore they can be good reflector. What do you guys think?
How do you define the surface impedance for insulators? The formula for metals contains the conductivity and skin depth. But anyway, the reflection coefficient for insulators depends on what is called the wave impedance or just the impedance of the medium.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garryA
  • #11
berkeman said:
That is not a valid reference for discussion at PF.
Iam not trying to use that as a reference, I simply trying to understand the reflection behavior of material.
Since my knowledge in this field is a bit limited
 
  • #12
Maybe it is good idea to start by looking at each case (ideal insulator and ideal conductor) separately.
 
  • #13
If we make a prism out of paraffin wax, we can demonstrate total internal reflection at microwave frequencies by using an insulator.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, garryA and nasu
  • #14
nasu said:
How do you define the surface impedance for insulators? The formula for metals contains the conductivity and skin depth. But anyway, the reflection coefficient for insulators depends on what is called the wave impedance or just the impedance of the medium.
I found here that surfaces impendance affect reflection
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ha...h-Impedance_Surface_Design_Considerations.pdf
"High-Impedance Surfaces (HIS) have been extensively investigated in the field of antennas. Such metasurfaces exhibit an in-phase reflection of incident waves, that makes them to behave like an Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) within a limited frequency range. Consequently, HIS can be used as efficient reflectors"
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Delta2
  • #15
tech99 said:
If we make a prism out of paraffin wax, we can demonstrate total internal reflection at microwave frequencies by using an insulator.
I didn't know paraffin wax can reflect radiowave
 
  • #16
garryA said:
I found here that surfaces impendance affect reflection
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ha...h-Impedance_Surface_Design_Considerations.pdf
"High-Impedance Surfaces (HIS) have been extensively investigated in the field of antennas. Such metasurfaces exhibit an in-phase reflection of incident waves, that makes them to behave like an Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) within a limited frequency range. Consequently, HIS can be used as efficient reflectors"
Though that paper doesn't explicitly state from what material HIS are constructed from, I think is is left implied that they are made by good conductors and not insulators.
 
  • #17
Delta2 said:
Though that paper doesn't explicitly state from what material HIS are constructed from, I think is is left implied that they are made by good conductors and not insulators.
Isn't conductor supposed to have low surfaces impendance?
 
  • #18
garryA said:
Isn't conductor supposed to have low surfaces impendance?
I think you are confusing the electrical impedance or ohmic resistance with the characteristic impedance of a material.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
795
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
8K