Can an Observer Moving at Light Speed Measure Their Own Speed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of an observer moving at the speed of light and the implications for measuring their own speed. It touches on principles of special relativity and the nature of light as a massless particle, exploring both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that any observer measures their own speed as zero with respect to themselves, but emphasize that no observer can actually move at the speed of light relative to another object.
  • One participant proposes a scenario where an observer chases a light beam at speeds very close to light speed, suggesting that the light beam would still appear to escape at the constant speed of light, c.
  • Another participant questions the speed of a particle of light with respect to itself, suggesting it should be defined as zero, but acknowledges the challenge in associating a coordinate system with a massless particle's motion.
  • A later reply critiques earlier statements for potentially misleading beginners, emphasizing the necessity of specifying relative motion when discussing speed or velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of measuring speed at light speed, with no consensus reached on how to define or interpret these measurements.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in defining speed for massless particles and the implications of relative motion, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

hamsterman
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I know there is a postulate saying "The speed of light is the same to all observers in uniform motion", but I have a question about this:
What if the observer is moving at the speed of light and measuring its own speed. The result should be zero, right? I can't imagine how something could be moving faster than itself.
Any replies appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any observer measures his own speed as zero with respect to himself. But no observer can move at light speed with respect to something else.
 
The general Concept is:

"If a man chases an escaping light beam at speed very very close to that of light, He still finds the light beam escape from him with the same velocity as it would have escaped if he didn't chase it but simply stayed at the same place. The same velocity is the universal constant c"

Read the above paragraph again if you don't get it, I have worded it carefully.
 
I understand that, but what is the speed of a particle of light with respect to itself?
 
hamsterman said:
I understand that, but what is the speed of a particle of light with respect to itself?
We would have to define it to be 0. Any other definition would be absurd. Note however that it is something we would have to define, since there's no obvious way to associate a coordinate system with the motion of a massless particle. See my posts in this thread for more on that.
 
Thank you very much. It's as clear as it will ever get, I suppose.
 
thecritic said:
The general Concept is:

"If a man chases an escaping light beam at speed very very close to that of light, He still finds the light beam escape from him with the same velocity as it would have escaped if he didn't chase it but simply stayed at the same place. The same velocity is the universal constant c"

Read the above paragraph again if you don't get it, I have worded it carefully.

These statements can be misleading to a beginner in SR. When you make a statement about speed or velocity, you must say what it is relative to. Also, the statement "stayed at the same place" is meaningless. It implies somehow that something is not moving. Whether or not something is moving is meaningless. You can only say that something is moving or not moving relative to something else.

Matheinste.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K