A Can an Oscillating Eternal Universe be Described without Singularity?

victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
Consider the FLRW metric.

We pick a specific definition for the scale factor as suggested bellow.

Suppose we have a hypothetical metric having the scale factor defined by

## a(t)=\sin(t) (1+ \text {sgn}(\sin(t)) +\epsilon ##

Does this make sense, mathematically (and physically)?

Like having a continuous smooth (differentiable) manifold. Or relating to the geometric properties of homogeneity and isotropy, an expanding and contracting universe?

Can this describe an oscillating eternal infinite universe without singularity?

If it does not, how to write a metric that can do so?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
victorvmotti said:
Suppose we have a hypothetical metric having the scale factor
Just giving a scale factor doesn't tell us what the metric is. You need to write down the entire line element.
 
PeterDonis said:
Just giving a scale factor doesn't tell us what the metric is. You need to write down the entire line element.
Actually, I meant that the Standard Model of cosmology and its metric to be used, only that we pick a specific definition for the scale factor as suggested.
 
victorvmotti said:
Actually, I meant that the Standard Model of cosmology and its metric to be used, only that we pick a specific definition for the scale factor as suggested.
The Standard Model of cosmology already includes a definition for the scale factor, which is not yours.

If you mean the general FRW metric, you should be able to write it down. And you should also be able to plug your ansatz for the scale factor into the equations that that metric gives (the Friedmann Equations) to see whether they make sense. Anyone with the background knowledge for an "A" level thread on this topic should be able to do that.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top