Can anyone identify this series trick?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Deiniol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of an infinite series involving cosine terms, specifically transitioning from the equation u(x,t)=u_0(x)+u_1(x)\cos(\sigma t - \phi_1(x)) + u_1'(x)\cos(\sigma' t - \phi'_1(x)) to u=u_0+u_1\cos(n\sigma_rt-\phi_1) + u_1'\cos([n+\beta]\sigma_rt-\phi_1'). The key transformation involves defining σr as the difference between frequencies and introducing parameters n and β. The goal is to express u(x,t)|u(x,t)| in a form suitable for Fourier expansion, with the assumption that n=σ/σ_r is an integer being critical for the manipulation's validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and Fourier expansions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and cosine functions
  • Knowledge of frequency domain analysis
  • Basic concepts of phase shifts in wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fourier series and their applications
  • Learn about the properties of cosine functions in series expansions
  • Explore the implications of frequency differences in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the role of phase shifts in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with wave phenomena, signal processing, or anyone interested in advanced series manipulations and Fourier analysis.

Deiniol
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I am reading through a thesis and the author takes the infinite series:

\begin{equation}
u(x,t)=u_0(x)+u_1(x)\cos(\sigma t - \phi_1(x)) + u_1'(x)\cos(\sigma' t - \phi'_1(x))+\ldots
\end{equation}

and by letting σr be the difference between the frequencies σ and σ' changes the above to:

\begin{equation}
u=u_0+u_1\cos(n\sigma_rt-\phi_1) + u_1'\cos([n+\beta]\sigma_rt-\phi_1')+\ldots
\end{equation}

where β=±1 and n is an integer. I don't follow the manipulation from the first equation to the other, I just wondered if anyone is familiar with this trick and might be able to talk me through it. Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This would be unproblematic is if ##n=\sigma/\sigma_r## is not assumed to be an integer. It seems wrong otherwise, if ##u_1'=0## for example. So either this is wrong or ##n=\sigma/\sigma_r## should be assumed to be an integer, by some reason.
 
Thanks for the reply Erland. The reason for the change is to eventually get u(x,t)|u(x,t)| into a form suitable for a Fourier expansion. I think that by letting θ=σt-Φ1 and α=σrt+Φ11' where σr=σ-σ' to transform (1) in the OP to:

\begin{equation}
u(x,t)=u_0+u_1\cos(\theta)+u_1'\cos(\theta-\alpha)+u_2\cos(2\theta-[\phi_2-2\phi_1])+u_2'\cos(2\theta-2\alpha-[2\phi_1'+\phi_2'-4\phi_1])+\ldots
\end{equation}

should work fine. Then u|u| can be expanded into a Fourier series of θ.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K