Can anyone recommend any popular physics books explaining forces and fields etc?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on recommendations for popular physics books that explain forces and fields without heavy reliance on mathematical terminology. Key suggestions include "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" by Richard P. Feynman, which consists of three volumes covering mechanics, electromagnetism, and quantum physics, and "Matter & Interactions" by Ruth Chabay and Bruce Sherwood, emphasizing modern mechanics and electromagnetic theory. Participants agree that while analogies can aid understanding, a foundational grasp of mathematics is essential for deeper comprehension of physical concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts such as mechanics and electromagnetism.
  • Familiarity with mathematical principles relevant to physics.
  • Knowledge of modern physics topics, particularly quantum mechanics.
  • Awareness of the historical context of physics literature.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" for a conceptual understanding of physics.
  • Study "Matter & Interactions" to gain insights into modern mechanics and electromagnetic theory.
  • Research the relationship between mathematical concepts and physical theories.
  • Investigate older physics textbooks for foundational knowledge at a lower cost.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and enthusiasts in physics seeking to deepen their understanding of forces and fields, as well as those interested in conceptual approaches to physics without extensive mathematical prerequisites.

AJH
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have had some success with a recent question on electric fields where people kindly explained the nature of electric fields by analogies without recourse to mathematical terminology. I would be interested to pick up any guide on mainstream physics that would resolve all the obvious why and how questions that arise when you consider the world. I wouldn't mind a detour into the strange world of the uber-small but am far less interested in black holes, the birth and shape of the universe etc.

Any tips would be highly appreciated.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A textbook that is very popular for "conceptual physics" and "descriptive physics" courses at the college/university level:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805391908/?tag=pfamazon01-20

New copies of the current edition are rather expensive (as are most textbooks), but used copies of earlier editions are much cheaper, and will work just about as well for your purposes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The books i like the most regarding specifically the conceptual part of physics are the three volumes of "The Feynman Lectures on Physics", written obviously, by Richard P. Feynman. Those books help me a lot understanding the concepts, he explains in a very clear and interesting way, i very much enjoy the reading.
i highly recommend it.

(excuse my english,i missed that class =P )

pd: The volume 1 is about mechanics, radiations and heat; the volume 2 about electromagnetism and matter and de volume 3 is about quantum physics
 
Last edited:
If you want the best introductory physics textbook, get Matter & Interactions by Ruth Chabay and Bruce Sherwood. It's a two volume set, with the first volume concentrating on modern mechanics and the second volume concentrating on electromagnetic theory. Fields are emphasized HEAVILY in the second volume.
 
AJH said:
I have had some success with a recent question on electric fields where people kindly explained the nature of electric fields by analogies without recourse to mathematical terminology. I would be interested to pick up any guide on mainstream physics that would resolve all the obvious why and how questions that arise when you consider the world. I wouldn't mind a detour into the strange world of the uber-small but am far less interested in black holes, the birth and shape of the universe etc.

Any tips would be highly appreciated.:smile:

I will second the Feynman lectures books, they are a superb read. That said, they don't work by "analogies" for physical ideas and they do use some mathematics - I personally find that a very misleading thing to do, to do physics by analogy to avoid maths. Physical ideas are very intimately related to mathematical concepts. In fact, many mathematical concepts found their original idea in physical concepts, after which mathematicians distilled away the physical application and kept the abstract mathematical structure. Now, you have a certain liberty in the mathematical sophistication you want to apply, but trying to do *without* it, is like trying to get answers to the conceptual problems in business bookkeeping without wanting to have a recourse to arithmetic.
 
yes, Feynman uses some mathematics, but to understand the math is not that necessary to understand the concepts underneath it (of course, to really undestand it you have to be familiar with math, I mean, as a first approach to it). Obviously, i recommend you to study math and to learn physics through it. Anyway, this applies to the first and second volumes, since you definitely need to comprehend mathematical concepts in order to be able to understand quantum physics (the third volume)
 
Err..

Any old physics book will work... I mean, physics hasn't changed over the years in reality. Older=cheaper too XD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
56K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K