MHB Can $B \subseteq A$ Be Proven with Elements Defined as $2b-2$ and $2a$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
let $A = \left\{ m \in \Bbb{Z} | m = 2a \right\}$ and let $B = \left\{ n \in \Bbb{Z} | n = 2b - 2 \right\}$

Prove that$ B \subseteq A$

My proof is:
let $x = 2b - 2$ for some int $b$ I need to show that $x = 2a$ for some int $a$.

let $a = b - 1$, $b$ is some integer therefore $a$ in this case is some integer. And $2a = 2b - 2$. since $x = 2b - 2$ then , then $x = 2a$ which is what was to be shown.Is this sufficient proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi tmt,

The proof is correct, but I think there's a more straightforward way of presenting the same proof.

Given $n = 2b - 2 $, then $n=2(b-1)$. Let $a=b-1$, then $n=2a$. Hence, $B \subseteq A$.
 
tmt said:
let $A = \left\{ m \in \Bbb{Z} | m = 2a \right\}$ and let $B = \left\{ n \in \Bbb{Z} | n = 2b - 2 \right\}$
It is also better to define the sets $A$ and $B$ as follows.
\[
A = \{2a \mid a\in \Bbb{Z} \},\quad B = \{ 2b - 2 \mid b \in \Bbb{Z} \}
\]
In the original definition it is not clear what $a$ and $b$ are. In particular, it is not clear whether $m=2a$ for all $a$ (well, this is clearly not the case), $m=2a$ for some $a$ or whether $a$ comes from the surrounding context. Also, it is not clear what set $a$ and $b$ range over. If they range over reals, for example, then $1\in A$ since $1=2\cdot(1/2)$ and $1\in\Bbb Z$.

And finally, the vertical bar in the set-builder notation is best typeset with [m]\mid[/m]: it creates correct spaced on both sides.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top