Can baseballs truly synchronize clocks ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks
Click For Summary
Baseballs can theoretically synchronize clocks, but this synchronization won't be absolute due to the principles of relativity. Einstein's theory states that simultaneity is relative and can differ across inertial frames. While tossing baseballs could achieve synchronization similar to that of light, accuracy in the tossing mechanism presents challenges. Faster baseballs, akin to particles in a particle accelerator, could enhance synchronization accuracy. Ultimately, the synchronization achieved will be relative, not absolute, aligning with the predictions of relativity.
Edd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Einstein defined truly or absolutely synchronous clocks as follows:
"The simultaneity of two definite events with reference to one inertial system involves
the simultaneity of these events in reference to all inertial systems. This is what is meant
when we say that the time of classical mechanics is absolute. According to the special
theory of relativity it is otherwise."
http://hep.fi.infn.it/calvetti/A.Einstein-Relativity.pdf page 83

Suppose we have a double-armed baseball tossing machine that can toss two baseballs
equally forcefully in opposite directions. If this machine is placed midway between two
unstarted-but-set-to-start-on-zero clocks, it seems to me that a couple of machine-tossed
baseballs would start the clocks at absolutely the same time, thereby absolutely synching them.

Is there any physical reason why this won't happen? Just wondering….

Edd
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edd said:
Einstein defined truly or absolutely synchronous clocks as follows:
"The simultaneity of two definite events with reference to one inertial system involves
the simultaneity of these events in reference to all inertial systems. This is what is meant
when we say that the time of classical mechanics is absolute. According to the special
theory of relativity it is otherwise."
http://hep.fi.infn.it/calvetti/A.Einstein-Relativity.pdf page 83

Suppose we have a double-armed baseball tossing machine that can toss two baseballs
equally forcefully in opposite directions. If this machine is placed midway between two
unstarted-but-set-to-start-on-zero clocks, it seems to me that a couple of machine-tossed
baseballs would start the clocks at absolutely the same time, thereby absolutely synching them.

Is there any physical reason why this won't happen? Just wondering….

Edd

Relativity predicts that the baseball tossing mechanism will provide the same synchronization as light-tossing.

It will be hard to toss baseballs accurately enough to get experimental verification. You can improve accuracy by tossing the baseballs faster and faster. In fact, if you use a particle accelerator to accelerate particles as fast as you can, the particles will be moving essentially at the speed of light - very fast baseballs, in essence.

The idea is that all fair synchronization, whether it is based on very fast particles, or very accurately tossed lower-speed particles, or light itself, will be equivalent.

Relativity predicts tha tthe speed of light being the same for all observers and the same in all directions , i.e. isotropy, and also that that limiting speed, c matches the limiting speed of how fast you can toss a baseball and/or elementary particle. A consequence of relativity is that you get different synchronization results for different frames of reference. See "the relativity of simultaneity" , and/or "Einstein's train" there's been a number of recent threads on the concept.

So the short answer is that you can synchronize clocks with baseballs, but you won't thereby achieve an "absolute" synchronization, you'll get the same relative synchronization that you get with light.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
783
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K