Can baseballs truly synchronize clocks ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks
Edd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Einstein defined truly or absolutely synchronous clocks as follows:
"The simultaneity of two definite events with reference to one inertial system involves
the simultaneity of these events in reference to all inertial systems. This is what is meant
when we say that the time of classical mechanics is absolute. According to the special
theory of relativity it is otherwise."
http://hep.fi.infn.it/calvetti/A.Einstein-Relativity.pdf page 83

Suppose we have a double-armed baseball tossing machine that can toss two baseballs
equally forcefully in opposite directions. If this machine is placed midway between two
unstarted-but-set-to-start-on-zero clocks, it seems to me that a couple of machine-tossed
baseballs would start the clocks at absolutely the same time, thereby absolutely synching them.

Is there any physical reason why this won't happen? Just wondering….

Edd
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edd said:
Einstein defined truly or absolutely synchronous clocks as follows:
"The simultaneity of two definite events with reference to one inertial system involves
the simultaneity of these events in reference to all inertial systems. This is what is meant
when we say that the time of classical mechanics is absolute. According to the special
theory of relativity it is otherwise."
http://hep.fi.infn.it/calvetti/A.Einstein-Relativity.pdf page 83

Suppose we have a double-armed baseball tossing machine that can toss two baseballs
equally forcefully in opposite directions. If this machine is placed midway between two
unstarted-but-set-to-start-on-zero clocks, it seems to me that a couple of machine-tossed
baseballs would start the clocks at absolutely the same time, thereby absolutely synching them.

Is there any physical reason why this won't happen? Just wondering….

Edd

Relativity predicts that the baseball tossing mechanism will provide the same synchronization as light-tossing.

It will be hard to toss baseballs accurately enough to get experimental verification. You can improve accuracy by tossing the baseballs faster and faster. In fact, if you use a particle accelerator to accelerate particles as fast as you can, the particles will be moving essentially at the speed of light - very fast baseballs, in essence.

The idea is that all fair synchronization, whether it is based on very fast particles, or very accurately tossed lower-speed particles, or light itself, will be equivalent.

Relativity predicts tha tthe speed of light being the same for all observers and the same in all directions , i.e. isotropy, and also that that limiting speed, c matches the limiting speed of how fast you can toss a baseball and/or elementary particle. A consequence of relativity is that you get different synchronization results for different frames of reference. See "the relativity of simultaneity" , and/or "Einstein's train" there's been a number of recent threads on the concept.

So the short answer is that you can synchronize clocks with baseballs, but you won't thereby achieve an "absolute" synchronization, you'll get the same relative synchronization that you get with light.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top